2019
DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2019.1704801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near fault ground motion effects on seismic resilience of frame structures damaged in Wenchuan earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a single accident, in some references [7,10,11,24], different projects have different delay recovery periods, the delay period is random and influenced by the resource fulness.…”
Section: Resilience Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a single accident, in some references [7,10,11,24], different projects have different delay recovery periods, the delay period is random and influenced by the resource fulness.…”
Section: Resilience Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Should the delay recovery period be considered? In some references [7,10,11,24], the resilience index without considering the delay recovery period had been applied. However, for the practical bridges after earthquakes, it often delays some time before the emergency reinforcement or repair recovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8] During the past two decades, ground motions with these strong pulses are of particular interest in earthquake engineering, since the intense pulses can impose particularly high seismic demands on engineered structures because of the concentrated energy that is required to be dissipated in a single or a relatively few plastic cycles. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Ever since the severe unexpected structural damage sustained in, for example, the 1971 San Fernando, the 1994 Northridge and the 1995 Kobe earthquakes, there have been continued efforts for the analysis of near-fault ground motions, including the ones observed in the newly occurred M w 7.8 Gaziantep (Turkey) earthquake. 19 Considering the limitations of visual inspection in identifying pulse-like features, Baker 20 used the wavelet analysis, with the Daubechies wavelet of the fourth order as the mother wavelet, to extract the largest velocity pulse, and the size of the extracted pulse relative to the original motion is employed to determine the significance of pulse-like features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ground motions containing such pulses usually have large amplitude with energy concentrated in a narrow‐band frequency region, and thereby yield unusual response spectral shapes that are accompanied by an amplified “bump” in the medium‐to‐long period range centered close to the pulse period ( T p ) 5–8 . During the past two decades, ground motions with these strong pulses are of particular interest in earthquake engineering, since the intense pulses can impose particularly high seismic demands on engineered structures because of the concentrated energy that is required to be dissipated in a single or a relatively few plastic cycles 9–18 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%