Near-Earth phase risk comparison of human Mars campaign architectures

Abstract

A risk analysis of the launch, orbital assembly, and Earthdeparture phases of human Mars exploration campaign architectures was completed as an extension of a probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) originally carried out under the NASA Constellation Program Ares V Project [1]. The objective of the updated analysis was to study the sensitivity of loss-ofcampaign risk to such architectural factors as composition of the propellant delivery portion of the launch vehicle fleet (Ares V heavy-lift launch vehicle vs. smaller/cheaper commercial launchers) and the degree of launcher or Mars-bound spacecraft element sparing. Both a static PRA analysis and a dynamic, event-based Monte Carlo simulation were developed and used to evaluate the probability of loss of campaign under different sparing options. Results showed that with no sparing, loss-of-campaign risk is strongly driven by launcher count and on-orbit loiter duration, favoring an all-Ares V launch approach. Further, the reliability of the all-Ares V architecture showed significant improvement with the addition of a single spare launcher/payload. Among architectures utilizing a mix of Ares V and commercial launchers, those that minimized the on-orbit loiter duration of Mars-bound elements were found to exceed the reliability of no spare all-Ares V campaign if unlimited commercial vehicle sparing was assumed.

Risk and Performance Assessment of Generic Mission Architectures: Showcasing the Artemis Mission

“…Previously, similar simulations have been performed as part of the Lunar Surface Systems (LSS) project [2], [3] or Mars campaign architectures [4]. These simulations depended on GoldSim, a commercial software that runs only on the Windows operating systems.…”