“…The procedure for the Neo-Deterministic Seismic Hazard Assessment NDSHA (Panza et al, 1996;2001;Panza, 2017;Panza and Bela, 2019) is based on the computation of realistic and physics-based synthetic seismograms (earthquake scenarios) -and the end products of NDSHA are therefore synthetic ground motion accelero-grams, veloci-grams and displacement-grams. In NDSHA, seismic hazard is defined as "the envelope of the values of earthquake ground motion parameters": (a) considering a wide set of scenario events (including Maximum Credible Earthquakes MCE); and…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, there has always been clear evidence from the time it was authoratively first proposed that PSHA is wrong (Panza and Bela, 2019), but particularly within this past decade -with our benefit finally (calendarwise) now of true 2020 hindsight! (Wyss et al, 2012;Bela 2014;Mulargia et al, 2017;Stark and Freedman, 2016;Stark, 2017;Rugarli et al, 2019a) -we can say for certain that PSHA"s "technological inexactitudes", which unfortunately make up its body of knowledge, cannot ever reliably fulfill on either their presumptions or their promises!…”
Section: The Fault Lies Not In Our Stars But In Ourselvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5). DGA estimation has been validated in many instances: both regionally and at regional and local scale (See Fasan et al, 2016;Panza, 2017;Parvez et al, 2017;De Natale et al, 2019;Panza, 2020).…”
“…Since PSHA is false, it is not falsifiable and it cannot be tested! A detailed review of the traditional PSHA method (see Supplementary material in Panza and Bela, 2019) revealed that the method itself is inadequate to describe the physical process of earthquake occurrence, because of its built-in and required assumption of a "memoryless" stochastic process, or Poisson process. (e.g., Ferraes, 1967.…”
Section: Validations By the Factsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed description of the development and evolution of NDSHA methodologies during these last two decades has been previously published in Panza and Bela (2019) and Supplementary material therein. This paper now presents both a critical updating of that previous work, which comprehensively also includes as illustration -"A Bibliographic Journey to a New Paradigm" -(7) (PDF) Supplementary material for "NDSHA: A new paradigm for reliable seismic hazard assessment"/Giuliano Panza -Academia.edu -as well as a focused orientation on how we can better keep alert for the "safety of human lives" -by also more selectively basing our efforts on reliable seismic hazard assessment methods, as are available in NDSHA.…”
A New Paradigm (data driven and not like the currently model driven) is needed for Reliable Seismic Hazard Assessment RSHA. Neo-Deterministic Seismic Hazard Assessment (NDSHA) integrates earthquake geology, earthquake science, and particularly earthquake physics to finally achieve a New (and needed) Paradigm for Reliable Seismic Hazard Assessment RSHA.Although observations from many recent destructive earthquakes have all confirmed the validity of NDSHA’s approach and application to earthquake hazard forecasting-nonetheless damaging earthquakes still cannot yet be predicted with a precision requirement consistent with issuing a red alert and evacuation order to protect civil populations. However, intermediate-term (time scale) and middle-range (space scale) predictions of main shocks above a pre-assigned threshold may be properly used for the implementation of low-key preventive safety actions, as recommended by UNESCO in 1997. Furthermore, a proper integration of both seismological and geodetic information has been shown to also reliably contribute to a reduction of the geographic extent of alarms and it therefore defines a New Paradigm for TimeDependent Hazard Scenarios: Intermediate-Term (time scale) and Narrow-Range (space scale) Earthquake Prediction.
“…The procedure for the Neo-Deterministic Seismic Hazard Assessment NDSHA (Panza et al, 1996;2001;Panza, 2017;Panza and Bela, 2019) is based on the computation of realistic and physics-based synthetic seismograms (earthquake scenarios) -and the end products of NDSHA are therefore synthetic ground motion accelero-grams, veloci-grams and displacement-grams. In NDSHA, seismic hazard is defined as "the envelope of the values of earthquake ground motion parameters": (a) considering a wide set of scenario events (including Maximum Credible Earthquakes MCE); and…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, there has always been clear evidence from the time it was authoratively first proposed that PSHA is wrong (Panza and Bela, 2019), but particularly within this past decade -with our benefit finally (calendarwise) now of true 2020 hindsight! (Wyss et al, 2012;Bela 2014;Mulargia et al, 2017;Stark and Freedman, 2016;Stark, 2017;Rugarli et al, 2019a) -we can say for certain that PSHA"s "technological inexactitudes", which unfortunately make up its body of knowledge, cannot ever reliably fulfill on either their presumptions or their promises!…”
Section: The Fault Lies Not In Our Stars But In Ourselvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5). DGA estimation has been validated in many instances: both regionally and at regional and local scale (See Fasan et al, 2016;Panza, 2017;Parvez et al, 2017;De Natale et al, 2019;Panza, 2020).…”
“…Since PSHA is false, it is not falsifiable and it cannot be tested! A detailed review of the traditional PSHA method (see Supplementary material in Panza and Bela, 2019) revealed that the method itself is inadequate to describe the physical process of earthquake occurrence, because of its built-in and required assumption of a "memoryless" stochastic process, or Poisson process. (e.g., Ferraes, 1967.…”
Section: Validations By the Factsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed description of the development and evolution of NDSHA methodologies during these last two decades has been previously published in Panza and Bela (2019) and Supplementary material therein. This paper now presents both a critical updating of that previous work, which comprehensively also includes as illustration -"A Bibliographic Journey to a New Paradigm" -(7) (PDF) Supplementary material for "NDSHA: A new paradigm for reliable seismic hazard assessment"/Giuliano Panza -Academia.edu -as well as a focused orientation on how we can better keep alert for the "safety of human lives" -by also more selectively basing our efforts on reliable seismic hazard assessment methods, as are available in NDSHA.…”
A New Paradigm (data driven and not like the currently model driven) is needed for Reliable Seismic Hazard Assessment RSHA. Neo-Deterministic Seismic Hazard Assessment (NDSHA) integrates earthquake geology, earthquake science, and particularly earthquake physics to finally achieve a New (and needed) Paradigm for Reliable Seismic Hazard Assessment RSHA.Although observations from many recent destructive earthquakes have all confirmed the validity of NDSHA’s approach and application to earthquake hazard forecasting-nonetheless damaging earthquakes still cannot yet be predicted with a precision requirement consistent with issuing a red alert and evacuation order to protect civil populations. However, intermediate-term (time scale) and middle-range (space scale) predictions of main shocks above a pre-assigned threshold may be properly used for the implementation of low-key preventive safety actions, as recommended by UNESCO in 1997. Furthermore, a proper integration of both seismological and geodetic information has been shown to also reliably contribute to a reduction of the geographic extent of alarms and it therefore defines a New Paradigm for TimeDependent Hazard Scenarios: Intermediate-Term (time scale) and Narrow-Range (space scale) Earthquake Prediction.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.