2015
DOI: 10.1101/014043
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NCBI BLAST + integrated into Galaxy

Abstract: Background: The NCBI BLAST suite has become ubiquitous in modern molecular biology and is used for small tasks such as checking capillary sequencing results of single PCR products, genome annotation or even larger scale pan-genome analyses. For early adopters of the Galaxy web-based biomedical data analysis platform, integrating BLAST into Galaxy was a natural step for sequence comparison workflows. Findings: The command line NCBI BLAST+ tool suite was wrapped for use within Galaxy. Appropriate datatypes were … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transcript quantification was generated via Salmon (Patro, Duggal, Love, Irizarry, & Kingsford, ) as filtered trimmed reads were back aligned to the assembled transcriptome. Annotations were created by blasting the translated transcriptome against the UniProtKB (Swiss‐Prot) database by BLASTP (Camacho et al, ; Cock, Chilton, Grüning, Johnson, & Soranzo, ). Annotations were also created from the nr database using Diamond (version 0.9.18) in sensitive mode (Buchfink, Xie, & Huson, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transcript quantification was generated via Salmon (Patro, Duggal, Love, Irizarry, & Kingsford, ) as filtered trimmed reads were back aligned to the assembled transcriptome. Annotations were created by blasting the translated transcriptome against the UniProtKB (Swiss‐Prot) database by BLASTP (Camacho et al, ; Cock, Chilton, Grüning, Johnson, & Soranzo, ). Annotations were also created from the nr database using Diamond (version 0.9.18) in sensitive mode (Buchfink, Xie, & Huson, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species‐specific primers for the CPD and 6‐4 PP photolyase genes and the β‐actin housekeeping gene were produced for quantitative PCR (Table ). CPD, 6‐4 PP B‐actin transcripts were identified from an in‐house reference larval L. peronii transcriptome (SRA bio‐sample accession number: PRJNA438838) using the BLASTN discontiguous megablast tool (Camacho et al, ; Cock, Chilton, Grüning, Johnson, & Soranzo, ) within the Galaxy Australia instance (http://usegalaxy.org.au) against homologous amphibian sequences (accession numbers: NM_001095658.1 CPD photolyase‐like L homolog [ Xenopus laevis ]; NM_001087952.2 Xenopus laevis 6‐4 photolyase; NM_213719 Xenopus tropicalis actin, beta). Primers were designed from the resulting L. peronii mRNA transcripts using PrimerQuest software (Integrated DNA Technologies) with acceptance of the default parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple alternatives to Sequenceserver similarly provide graphical user interfaces (GUIs) for BLAST (Tao, 2006; Deng et al ., 2007; O’Connor et al ., 2008; Cock et al ., 2015; NCBI, 2014). However, they have three broad levels of shortcomings (summarized in Supplementary Table S1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the most appropriate solution for many laboratories would be to have access to a shared graphical user interface to run BLAST on private datasets. Several free and open source software packages make this possible, including ViroBLAST (Deng et al ., 2007), GMOD’s BlastGraphic (O’Connor et al ., 2008), NCBI’s wwwblast (Tao, 2006), NCBI’s Amazon Cloud BLAST (NCBI, 2014), and Galaxy BLAST (Cock et al ., 2015). Unfortunately, setting up such interfaces is challenging: they are either deprecated and no longer maintained, or have complex installation dependencies such as custom configuration of the Apache web server (Fielding & Kaiser, 1997) or CGI paths (Gundavaram, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation