2015
DOI: 10.1101/033142
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequenceserver: a modern graphical user interface for custom BLAST databases

Abstract: 28The dramatic drop in DNA sequencing costs has created many opportunities for novel biological research. These 29 opportunities largely rest upon the ability to effectively compare newly obtained and previously known sequences. 30This is commonly done with BLAST, yet using BLAST directly on new datasets requires substantial technical skills or 31 helpful colleagues. Furthermore, graphical interfaces for BLAST are challenging to install and largely mimic underlying 32 computational processes rather than work p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
97
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our curation pipeline is described in detail in Supporting Information Methods. Briefly, we iteratively performed blastn and blastp (Camacho et al 2009;Priyam et al 2015) searches of the fire ant genome assembly ) using as queries the previously known fire ant OBP sequences as well as UniProt sequences that are part of the Pfam family "PBP_GOBP" (Finn et al 2014;UniProt Consortium 2015). We manually curated the results of these searches by inspecting alignments of transcriptomic and genomic reads, which allowed us to infer intron-exon boundaries and coding sequences of these OBPs.…”
Section: Curationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our curation pipeline is described in detail in Supporting Information Methods. Briefly, we iteratively performed blastn and blastp (Camacho et al 2009;Priyam et al 2015) searches of the fire ant genome assembly ) using as queries the previously known fire ant OBP sequences as well as UniProt sequences that are part of the Pfam family "PBP_GOBP" (Finn et al 2014;UniProt Consortium 2015). We manually curated the results of these searches by inspecting alignments of transcriptomic and genomic reads, which allowed us to infer intron-exon boundaries and coding sequences of these OBPs.…”
Section: Curationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coordinates of Dw2 and Dw3 were obtained from Morris et al (2013) and Multani et al (2003). The corresponding locations of the markers in Sbi3 were obtained using Biopieces for sequence extraction and BLAST via a local instance of Sequenceserver (Altschul et al, 1997;Paterson et al, 2009;Priyam et al, 2015;www.biopieces.org). Physical locations relative to Sbi3 were used as the QTL intervals for comparison with this study.…”
Section: Qtl Mapping and Comparison With Prior Qtl Studies From The Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dendrogram was constructed by using Molecular Evolutionary Genetics version 7.0 [86]. The functional description related to domains of uncharacterized proteins has been predicted using the protein sequence of 116 genes downloaded from the Cotton Functional Genomics database () [87]. The evolutionary relationship among all selected genes was summed up to provide a clear picture of functions with reference to upregulated genes of the superfamily WDR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%