1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4573(96)00067-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Navigation via similarity: Automatic linking based on semantic closeness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows clustering and searching for records, and also facilitates matching between periods mentioned in database records and within the grey literature documents. A semantic closeness calculation for time periods used in previous work at Glamorgan (described more fully in [24]) was incorporated into a custom application (STAR.TIMELINE) to batch process the cleansed data records, comparing the derived start/end dates against our collated list of known periods. Periods frequently overlapped or were contained within others, so the matching method accommodated these issues to suggest the most appropriate match.…”
Section: Aligning Data Records With Known Time Periodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows clustering and searching for records, and also facilitates matching between periods mentioned in database records and within the grey literature documents. A semantic closeness calculation for time periods used in previous work at Glamorgan (described more fully in [24]) was incorporated into a custom application (STAR.TIMELINE) to batch process the cleansed data records, comparing the derived start/end dates against our collated list of known periods. Periods frequently overlapped or were contained within others, so the matching method accommodated these issues to suggest the most appropriate match.…”
Section: Aligning Data Records With Known Time Periodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it obfuscates one of the chief reasons for associating documents; that their contents are similar in some way. Conceptual Hypermedia Systems (CHS) specify the hypertext structure and behaviour in terms of a well-defined conceptual schema [7,28,33]. This types documents and links, and includes a conceptual domain model used to describe document content.…”
Section: Using Metadata For Linkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next stage in the development of the ontology service is to incorporate a DL model, and to use that to control the update and maintenance of the ontology as it encounters new terms on the Web. In various systems the conceptual model forming the links between documents is exposed and explicitly navigable [4,28], whereas in [33] the classification scheme is more implicit. This raises issues of the presentation of links, the rendering of concept-based links, and the visibility of the ontology during linking and its use in query construction.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Users with similar interests follow similar paths and therefore they leave comparable trails. By matching trails, we match users, i.e., the similarity measures are based on traversal only (see also Tudhope and Taylor (1997) for other measures). MEMOIR lets the user ask questions such as``who else reads similar documents?''…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%