Navigating Local Environments with Global Strategies: A Contingency Model of Multinational Subsidiary Performance

Abstract

Multinational corporations (MNCs) often pursue global strategies that emphasize efficiency, flexibility, and learning, but globally developed strategies often clash with the environmental idiosyncrasies of MNC country subsidiary markets in which the strategy is actually implemented. Extant research pays little attention to the contingent efficacy of such global strategies from the perspective of MNC country subsidiary markets. We adopt the strategy-environment alignment principle and study how host country task- and institutional environments might influence the efficacy of global strategies for MNC subsidiary performance. We assess MNC subsidiary performance using subjective managerial judgments, and on the basis of recent research on human judgments, we theorize that these judgments embody information about judgment magnitude and uncertainty. A mean-variance function model simultaneously teases out the effects of the explanatory variables on the magnitude and uncertainty of MNC subsidiary performance judgments. To test the hypotheses, we analyze survey data from German and Japanese subsidiaries in the United States. The results support the use of the mean-variance function model and specific theory about the antecedents of performance judgment magnitude and uncertainty. Findings pertaining to interactions between global strategies and the facets of the local country environment reveal ways in which MNCs can adapt “global” strategies to navigate the complex array of country markets they face.multinational corporation, global strategies, environment, judgment uncertainty

Two new methods for estimating structural equation models: An illustration and a comparison with two established methods

“…The methods are attributed to Croon (2002) and to Skrondal and Laake (2001). Although these methods were proposed nearly a decade ago, our review found only two instances of their application in published empirical research (Grewal, Chandrashekaran, & Dwyer, 2008;Grewal & Slotegraaf, 2007). As the new methods were introduced in rather technical literature, an understanding of the process of implementation may be inaccessible to a non-mathematical audience.…”

MNC subsidiary channel relationships as extended links: Implications of global strategies

“…to which the MNC emphasized a particular global strategy, we adopted measures developed by Grewal, Chandrashekaran, and Dwyer (2008). These measures assess the extent to which the MNC emphasizes a specific strategy from subsidiary managers' perspective.…”

Understanding the Role of Consumer Heterogeneity in the Formation of Satisfaction Uncertainty

“…Drawing on extant research on the mean-variance modeling of consumer judgments (Chandrashekaran et al, 2007;Grewal, Chandrashekaran, & Dwyer, 2008) and satisfaction (Chandrashekaran, Rotte, & Grewal, 2005), let SAT i denote the stated satisfaction of the ith consumer and recognize that SAT i is a realization from a distribution of possible satisfaction. While satisfaction magnitude is captured by the central tendency of that distribution, lack of satisfaction certainty is manifested in greater variance of that distribution.…”

“…This research is also motivated by marketing modeling literature that decomposes attitude into attitude magnitude and attitude uncertainty (Grewal, Chandrashekaran, & Dwyer, 2008;Chandrashekaran, McNeilly, Russ, & Marinova, 2000;Chandrashekaran, Rotte, & Grewal, 2005;Chandrashekaran et al, 2007;Rotte et al, 2006Rotte et al, , 2009. Captured by the Judgment Uncertainty and Magnitude Parameters (JUMP) model (see Chandrashekaran et al, 2000Chandrashekaran et al, , 2005, this twodimensional view of attitude resonates with the vast literature on attitude uncertainty (Gross, Holtz, & Miller, 1995).…”