1998
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.58.16118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nature of bonding forces between two hydrogen-passivated silicon wafers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This value is again in line with the work of separation that can be calculated using both attractive and repulsive parts of the force: Considering the longer range of the attractive van der Waals part only (which is dominant in the collapsed regime) A/12πd 2 , one obtains a factor of (d 1 /d 2 ) 2 =10 in the energies, consistent with the observed E 2 /E 1 ratio. Note that more exact formalisms developed from ab-initio calculations [26] predicted energies in the range of the observed one for the collapsed situation, in contradiction with measurements that were done using HF-last surface samples. Hence, the reported discrepancies between energy calculations and measurements could be manifestations of the effect of short wavelength surface roughness with the presence of an asperity gap.…”
Section: ]contrasting
confidence: 58%
“…This value is again in line with the work of separation that can be calculated using both attractive and repulsive parts of the force: Considering the longer range of the attractive van der Waals part only (which is dominant in the collapsed regime) A/12πd 2 , one obtains a factor of (d 1 /d 2 ) 2 =10 in the energies, consistent with the observed E 2 /E 1 ratio. Note that more exact formalisms developed from ab-initio calculations [26] predicted energies in the range of the observed one for the collapsed situation, in contradiction with measurements that were done using HF-last surface samples. Hence, the reported discrepancies between energy calculations and measurements could be manifestations of the effect of short wavelength surface roughness with the presence of an asperity gap.…”
Section: ]contrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Hence, it is less important for hydrogenated Si surfaces, where the hydrogen-hydrogen interaction is prominent as evidenced in the surface (ground-state) structures. 56,59 The efforts to understand the surface mechanics using experimental 60 and simulated 61 nanoindentation provide qualitative descriptions but the accurate (size-dependent) Young's modulus or the surface elastic constants have proved difficult to access via this indirect technique, leading to a need for direct measurement. In the work presented here first-principles calculations are crucial to deal properly with quantum mechanical effects such as the hydrogen-hydrogen interaction, and to investigate directly the size-dependent mechanical properties of the hydrogenated surface in a quantitative sense.…”
Section: B Surface Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other definitions of the bounding surface exist: for example, the midplane between two identical H-passivated surfaces at their minimum energy separation. 59 Had we taken a different definition of the crosssectional area, the apparent size dependence of E would have been different, an ambiguity associated with describing discrete atomic systems with continuum mechan-ics. To illustrate the issue, consider the effect on the size dependence of E from changing the definition of crosssectional area by modifying the position of the surface r by δr as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Geometry Of Nanowiresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is achieved by contacting the prepared hydrophobic wafers under clean conditions and with a moderate pressure. Recent calculations 4 suggest that the bonding forces in this regime are long-range van der Waal forces between the outermost Si atoms, which are kept apart by repulsive forces between the adsorbed hydrogen atoms. Next, between 150 and 300°C the bond energy increases slowly, possibly due to diffusion of weakly bound surface contaminants or formation of H-F-H or H-O-H bridges between the wafers.…”
Section: Fusion Bonding Of Si Wafers Investigated By X Ray Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%