Naturalness and Place in River Rehabilitation

Abstract

ABSTRACT. An authentic approach to river rehabilitation emphasizes concerns for the natural values of a given place. As landscape considerations fashion the physical template upon which biotic associations take place, various geomorphic issues must be addressed in framing rehabilitation activities that strive to improve river health. An open-ended approach to river classification promotes applications that appreciate the values of a given river, rather than pigeonholing reality. As the geomorphic structure of some rivers is naturally simple, promoting heterogeneity as a basis for management may not always be appropriate. Efforts to protect unique attributes of river systems must be balanced with procedures that look after common features. Concerns for ecosystem functionality must relate to the behavioral regime of a given river, remembering that some rivers are inherently sensitive to disturbance. Responses to human disturbance must be viewed in relation to natural variability, recognizing how spatial relationships in a catchment, and responses to past disturbances, fashion the operation of contemporary fluxes. These fluxes, in turn, influence what is achievable in the rehabilitation of a given reach. Given the inherently adjusting and evolutionary nature of river systems, notional endpoints do not provide an appropriate basis upon which to promote concepts of naturalness and place in the rehabilitation process. These themes are drawn together to promote rehabilitation practices that relate to the natural values of each river system, in preference to applications of "cookbook" measures that build upon textbook geomorphology.

Making Space for the River: Governance Experiences with Multifunctional River Flood Management in the US and Europe

“…Third, we have used the list of references of the publications we found and looked whether the lists contained references to relevant other scientific literature. Chenoweth et al 2002;Miller and Hirsch, 2003;Varis et al 2008 Mekong Australia Chenoweth et al 2002;Fryirs et al 2008;Miller and Hirsch, 2003;Spink et al 2009 The relevance of the literature is assessed by using three criteria. First, rivers or river basins are the object of the study.…”

Evaluating the process of ecological restoration

“…Evaluations based on restricted time periods may miss considerable amounts of information that, properly used, could have led to modification of the entire restoration process and hopefully better restoration practices in the future, i.e., adaptive management (Williams 2011). Instead, cookbook solutions (Hilderbrand et al 2005, Fryirs andBrierley 2009), often nonoptimal, are likely to become overused. To solve this problem, a revised approach to funding and monitoring is required.…”

The science of connected ecosystems: What is the role of catchment‐scale connectivity for healthy river ecology?

“…Fryirs, Brierley, Preston, & Kasai, ) at the toe of the slope, which reduced the efficiency of lateral connectivity. It is therefore important to understand landscape context and the differing operation of sediment cascades contingent upon the operation of both structural and transmission resistance (Brunsden, ; Fryirs & Brierley, ).…”