Naturalism and the Experiential Perspective

Markič, Olga

doi:10.7906/indecs.13.4.5

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…I am more sceptic, as were in fact also Clark and Chalmers, about qualitative experiences and feelings. I think we are still struggling to give them a proper treatment in naturalistic approaches [26][27][28]. Nevertheless I think that the hypothesis of extended cognition opens up the need for new interdisciplinary collaborations between biological, humanistic, social and technical approaches.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Extended Cognition: Feedback Loops and Coupled Systems

Markič¹

2017

Interdiscip. Descr. Complex Syst.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article explores two waves of active externalism. I first introduce the distinction between passive and active externalism and analyse a proposal of active externalism based on the principle of parity proposed by Clark and Chalmers. There are two main obstacles, causal-constitution fallacy and cognitive bloat, that threaten the extended cognition hypothesis. The second wave of discussions based on the complementarity principle deals with cognitive systems with feedback loops between internal and external elements and is a more radical departure from functionalism and traditional thinking about cognition. I conclude with some remarks on potential ethical considerations of extended cognition.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Extended Cognition: Feedback Loops and Coupled Systems

Markič¹

2017

Interdiscip. Descr. Complex Syst.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Decision‐making is an essential part of a leader's job and serves as a measure of their performance. Educational leaders are faced with many choices and dilemmas daily, and the results of their decisions will shape the development of their school and the quality of education (Markič, 2009). Dual systems theory suggests that cognitively rational and emotional systems have distinct neural mechanisms, with the rational system centering on the prefrontal cortex and the emotional system centering on the hippocampus.…”

Section: The Neural Basis Of Educational Leadershipmentioning

confidence: 99%

Neuro‐educational leadership: Pioneering educational leadership through neuroscience research

Zhang,

2024

Future in Educational Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Educators have been increasingly focused on the concept of educational leadership in the context of global educational reform. With the emergence of neuroscience, there is potential to further explore the theory and practice of educational leadership from a neuroscience perspective. This article provides an overview of the neuroscience research related to educational leadership, including leadership traits, styles, decision‐making, and contingency perspectives. Additionally, the article examines the application of neuroscience in the assessment and enhancement of educational leadership with the goal of providing useful insights.

show abstract

“…No, the path to a better life practice, to a more sovereign mastery of the world and life, to a more perfected well-being, the path of perfecting the usefulness of actualpractical and hypothetical-abstract tools is not a good path to take?! Of course, the path of fruitfully intertwining the rationality of positive science and philosophy has already been taken decades ago, as witnessed, for example, in many a study and research projects by cognitive scientists [9][10][11][12]. Cognitive science is thus a rewarding example of a successful intertwining of theory and practice, where the phenomenological, strictly theoretical insights are invested into the scientific manipulation of cognitive reality.…”

Section: Back To Natural Sciencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Suspension of Phenomenological Judgement of Scientific Naivety

Lozar

2017

Interdiscip. Descr. Complex Syst.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article addresses the negative judgements on natural sciences, however persistent and frequent they may be, found scattered in the philosophical texts of the two founding fathers of phenomenology, Edmund Husserl and Martin Heidegger. It first presents these harsh views and then, by assuming the phenomenological method, advocated by both philosophers, endeavours to suspend these judgements in favour of a phenomenologically more adequate description of the scientific comportment, trying to do justice to its non-philosophical excellence. The basic claim of the treatise is that Husserl's and Heidegger's criticisms should only be understood in the defensive sense of procuring a firm and safe ground for theoretical comportment, bios theoretikos. Such an approach, however, begs for a phenomenological description of the intrinsic excellence of science, which might be phenomenologically most accurately understood as most rigorous practical comportment, as bios praktikos.

show abstract

Naturalism and the Experiential Perspective

Cited by 5 publications

References 14 publications

Extended Cognition: Feedback Loops and Coupled Systems

Extended Cognition: Feedback Loops and Coupled Systems

Neuro‐educational leadership: Pioneering educational leadership through neuroscience research

Suspension of Phenomenological Judgement of Scientific Naivety

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About