2010
DOI: 10.1002/qj.537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural ventilation effects on temperatures within Stevenson screens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of T z t are subtracted from T sa , giving T bias , which during nighttime periods (no solar radiation) is calculated to be 2 • C. The nighttime bias is removed from T bias , which is then regressed against the incoming shortwave radiation (K down ) within a www.the-cryosphere.net/11/2897/2017/ The Cryosphere, 11, 2897-2918, 2017 set of given ranges of measured wind speed (see below). The rationale here is that, for a given K down , the higher the wind speed, the more efficient the natural ventilation of the sensor, leading to smaller T bias (e.g., Harrison, 2010). The linear regression, applied on the 2012 data, yields the following relationship between T bias and K down :…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of T z t are subtracted from T sa , giving T bias , which during nighttime periods (no solar radiation) is calculated to be 2 • C. The nighttime bias is removed from T bias , which is then regressed against the incoming shortwave radiation (K down ) within a www.the-cryosphere.net/11/2897/2017/ The Cryosphere, 11, 2897-2918, 2017 set of given ranges of measured wind speed (see below). The rationale here is that, for a given K down , the higher the wind speed, the more efficient the natural ventilation of the sensor, leading to smaller T bias (e.g., Harrison, 2010). The linear regression, applied on the 2012 data, yields the following relationship between T bias and K down :…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the methodology described in detail previously (Harrison, 2010), an experiment to compare temperatures measured inside a large thermometer screen with those measured in the adjacent open air was undertaken during summer 2010 at the Reading University Atmospheric Observatory. In brief, a fine wire platinum resistance thermometer system (Harrison and Pedder, 2001;Harrison and Rogers, 2006) was standardized to the large thermometer screen sensor using 5 min average values over at least two diurnal cycles.…”
Section: Outline Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• C (Harrison, 2010). Differences, T diff , between the open-air thermometer temperature, T open , and screen temperature, T scrn , were determined, together with coincident colocated measurements of wind speed † at 2 m, u 2 , direct beam irradiance, S b , and global solar irradiance, S g .…”
Section: Outline Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even if they were, any calibration adjustment documentation is either unavailable or not easily accessible. Even the present day standard of a screened thermometer may still contain biases compared to the "true" WMO recommended standard of shaded free air temperature (WMO, 1992(WMO, , 1998Harrison, 2011Harrison, , 2010. However, for analysis of changes in climate, achieving this WMO standard is less important than the long-term continuity of a given station and its practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%