2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural selection and veridical perceptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
79
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
79
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no reason to suppose that vision depends on feature detection, neural representation or probabilistic (Bayesian) inferences; the operational success of randomly varying neural circuitry that is retained or not retained seems sufficient to contend with the fundamental problem of behaving in the world whose physical nature is effectively unknowable (1-4; also ref. 23). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no reason to suppose that vision depends on feature detection, neural representation or probabilistic (Bayesian) inferences; the operational success of randomly varying neural circuitry that is retained or not retained seems sufficient to contend with the fundamental problem of behaving in the world whose physical nature is effectively unknowable (1-4; also ref. 23). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Palmer (1999: 23). 21 Ibid are supposed to do is a matter of debate (I will come back to this issue in section 3.4). However, what is important for my present purpose is that this process of relying on assumptions is not infallible after all: sometimes the visual system relies on wrong assumptions, resulting in visual error.…”
Section: Perceptual Error As Erroneous Judgmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43 Orlandi (2014, p. 70). 44 Mark et al (2010). Also, see: Hoffman and Prakash (2014), Singh and Hoffman (2013).…”
Section: Why Do We Need Perceptual Content?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such model is in line with the signal-processing approach towards image quality where it is generally taken for granted that there always will be a reference (for example, in image coding the original image) and that the impairment of image quality due to coding artifacts is related to the distance between the original and coded image 4,5 . Recently, however, the model of vision as inverse optics striving for veridicality has been challenged by the so-called interface theory of human perception 6,7,8,9 . This theory states that perception is not about accurately reconstructing the physical world but about constructing the properties and categories of an organism's perceptual world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theory states that perception is not about accurately reconstructing the physical world but about constructing the properties and categories of an organism's perceptual world. On evolutionary grounds 6,9 , one can argue that these perceptual structures are not intended to accurately match the physical world but, instead, are fast, intentiondriven explorations of the meaningless physical world in preparation of "optically guided potential behavior" 7,8 , thus striving for utility and efficiency, not veridicality. The efficacy of such mind-to-world approach to perception increases by making use of prototypes or templates like memory colors 10 or canonical visual size 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%