2016
DOI: 10.1080/09515089.2016.1142071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why do we need perceptual content?

Abstract: Most representationalists argue that perceptual experience has to be representational because phenomenal looks are, by themselves, representational. Charles Travis (2004) argues that looks cannot represent. I argue that perceptual experience has to be representational due to the way the visual system works.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Travis himself is not completely clear on this point, his more global motivation for critically assessing CV seems to be his allegiance to something like a direct realist or relationalist view of experience. For a discussion of representationalist and relationalist accounts of perception, cf Martin 2002, Burge 2005, Soteriou 2005, 2007, Brewer 2006, Glüer 2009, Genone 2014, Brogaard 2014, Cavedon-Taylor 2015, Nanay 2015, Raleigh 2015, de Sá Pereira 2016, Shahmoradi 2016, Schellenberg 2010, 2018. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Travis himself is not completely clear on this point, his more global motivation for critically assessing CV seems to be his allegiance to something like a direct realist or relationalist view of experience. For a discussion of representationalist and relationalist accounts of perception, cf Martin 2002, Burge 2005, Soteriou 2005, 2007, Brewer 2006, Glüer 2009, Genone 2014, Brogaard 2014, Cavedon-Taylor 2015, Nanay 2015, Raleigh 2015, de Sá Pereira 2016, Shahmoradi 2016, Schellenberg 2010, 2018. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%