1959
DOI: 10.2307/1929751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural Replacement of Chestnut by Other Species in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
68
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Borkh.) by Quercus prinus L. and Q. rubra L. in the Great Smoky Mountains (Woods & Shanks, 1959). Northern red oak Q. rubra L. significantly surpassed yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera L.) in its capacity for crown encroachment (lateral extension rates are 16.5 cm/year and 9.2 cm/year respectively) in Appalachian hardwood stands (Trimble & Tryon, 1966).…”
Section: Interspecific Differences and Cost Of Tree Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Borkh.) by Quercus prinus L. and Q. rubra L. in the Great Smoky Mountains (Woods & Shanks, 1959). Northern red oak Q. rubra L. significantly surpassed yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera L.) in its capacity for crown encroachment (lateral extension rates are 16.5 cm/year and 9.2 cm/year respectively) in Appalachian hardwood stands (Trimble & Tryon, 1966).…”
Section: Interspecific Differences and Cost Of Tree Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It has been reported, for instance, for conifers (Loehle, 1986;Stoll & Schmid, 1998;Umeki, 1995b) and broad-leaf trees (Brisson, 2001;Woods & Shanks, 1959), in tropical (Young & Hubbell, 1991) and temperate forested ecosystems (Frelich & Martin, 1988;Gysel, 1951;Stoll & Schmid, 1998;Webster & Lorimer, 2005). At the same time, different tree species vary significantly in their ability to execute plasticity patterns; this raises questions concerning the different life histories and ecological strategies associated with tree plasticity and light competition.…”
Section: Interspecific Differences and Cost Of Tree Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…White and Jentsch 2001). The convenience of examining weak to strong disturbances in plot-scale studies has led to numerous analyses and improved explanations of these phenomena (e.g., Downs 1938, Curtis 1943, Woods and Shanks 1959, Young and Hubbell 1991, Bellingham et al 1995). An enhanced comprehension of landscape-scale disturbances coincides with the rapid development of landscape ecology and the growing appreciation for the influences large, infrequent disturbances (LIDs) exert on species composition, structure, demography, and ecosystem processes (Foster et al 1998, Turner et al 1998, Turner 2005.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more recent nudation in Dryman Fork Basin might account for the greater proportional area of sparsely vegetated understory in this basin. Moreover, while chestnut blight affected both basins in a dramatic way, the demise of American chestnut is slow, in general, and slower still at higher elevations (Woods and Shanks, 1959). Dryman Fork Basin has a higher mean elevation than does Coweeta Basin, and it is feasible that chestnut mortality in Dryman Fork lagged that of Coweeta Basin, thereby retarding the availability of rotting logs as a seedling substrate for Rhododendron maximum.…”
Section: Historical Land Use and Disturbance Effects On Evergreen-undmentioning
confidence: 99%