2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chnaes.2019.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural radioactivity concentrations and dose assessment in coastal sediments along the East Coast of Tamilnadu, India with statistical approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
14
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the mean 238 U activity value of 34.64 ± 1.04 Bq/kg for sediment samples collected from Gosong Beach was slightly lower than the UNSCEAR global average value of 35 Bq/kg (UNSCEAR, 2000). These values were higher than those reported in a study from Tamilnadu, India (Devanesan et al, 2020;Harikrishnan et al, 2018) but lower than those from a study conducted in Ras Tanura, Saudi Arabia (El-Taher & Madkour, 2011).…”
Section: Activity Concentrations Of 238 U 232 Th and 40 K In The Sedi...contrasting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the mean 238 U activity value of 34.64 ± 1.04 Bq/kg for sediment samples collected from Gosong Beach was slightly lower than the UNSCEAR global average value of 35 Bq/kg (UNSCEAR, 2000). These values were higher than those reported in a study from Tamilnadu, India (Devanesan et al, 2020;Harikrishnan et al, 2018) but lower than those from a study conducted in Ras Tanura, Saudi Arabia (El-Taher & Madkour, 2011).…”
Section: Activity Concentrations Of 238 U 232 Th and 40 K In The Sedi...contrasting
confidence: 78%
“…The gamma dose absorbed at a distance of 1 meter from the sediment of natural radionuclides ( 238 U, 232 Th, and 40 K) was calculated according to guidelines provided by UNSCEAR (Devanesan et al, 2020;Harikrishnan et al, 2018;Maxwell et al, 2020;Ravisankar et al, 2015;Saleh et al, 2013;Sivakumar et al, 2014;SureshGandhi et al, 2014;Ugbede, 2020). The conversion factors used to calculate the absorbed gamma dose rate (DR) per unit of activity (Bq/kg) were 0.462 nGy/h for 238 U, 0.604 nGy/h for 232 Th, and 0.042 nGy/h for 40 K. The calculation is presented as follows:…”
Section: Estimation Of Absorbed Dose Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The natural radioactivity analysis of the coastline plays a significant role due to this richness. While there are plenty of research on the natural radioactivity levels of the coastline and their doses in various countries and regions of the world, very few studies have been conducted in Türkiye. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are plenty of research on the natural radioactivity levels of the coastline and their doses in various countries and regions of the world, very few studies have been conducted in Turkiye. 19,20 The present study was carried out to reveal the natural radioactivity levels of the beach sands of Cleopatra Beach and Damlatas Beach, to compute radiological parameters of excess lifetime cancer risk, radiation risk, radium equivalent activity, dose rates, and annual gonadal dose equivalent. The study also aims to interpret the impacts of these beaches on human health by considering the results and the average values reported for other places.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human exposure to natural radiation from building materials is both internal and external. The external exposure is caused by gamma radiation that is released from the building material as a consequence of the radioactive decay of the natural radionuclides present in them while the internal exposure is mainly caused by alpha-particle due to inhalation of radon daughters from the decay of radium-226 which is released from building materials to indoor air [7,8]. Long time exposure to nuclear particles emissions from building materials may lead to several health issues [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%