2001
DOI: 10.1201/9781420031638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural Organics Removal Using Membranes

Abstract: Membrane processes are increasingly used in water treatment. Experiments were performed using stirred cell equipment, polymeric membranes and synthetic surface water containing natural organics, inorganic colloids and their aggregates, and cations.All processes could remove a significant amount of natural organics. Pretreatment with ferric chloride was required to achieve significant organic removal with MF and high MWCO UF.Additionally, fouling mechanisms for the three processes were investigated. Crucial par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
75
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 294 publications
(600 reference statements)
3
75
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While there is some fouling in the absence of calcium (∆P of 4 kPa) and no fouling at all at high calcium concentration (>3 mM), a peak of membrane fouling was found at low calcium concentration in the vicinity of 0.5 mM (∆P of up to 12 kPa). While a similar phenomenon has also been reported for nanofiltration [15] and microfiltration [16] membranes for water and wastewater treatment applications, the actual mechanism is still unclear. Aoustin et al [17] studied the fouling of two ultrafiltration membranes due to natural organic matter and reported negligible calcium concentration effects.…”
Section: 2supporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While there is some fouling in the absence of calcium (∆P of 4 kPa) and no fouling at all at high calcium concentration (>3 mM), a peak of membrane fouling was found at low calcium concentration in the vicinity of 0.5 mM (∆P of up to 12 kPa). While a similar phenomenon has also been reported for nanofiltration [15] and microfiltration [16] membranes for water and wastewater treatment applications, the actual mechanism is still unclear. Aoustin et al [17] studied the fouling of two ultrafiltration membranes due to natural organic matter and reported negligible calcium concentration effects.…”
Section: 2supporting
confidence: 55%
“…This is further enhanced by the presence of a small amount of calcium (0.5 mM) which acts as a bridging ion and facilitates HA absorption to particulate matter and the membrane surface. HA is also known to foul membranes by gel formation and adsorption in the membrane pores [19]. High concentration of HAs within the cake layer can also result in a significant decrease in TOC retention (reduction from about 50 to 20%) as HA concentration increases (see Figure 5B).…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study was carried out which looked at the rejection abilities of a range of membranes targeting hematite colloids (40-500nm), NOM and cations, fouling conditions and cost of treatment of these processes with consideration of chemical pretreatment with ferric chloride [1]. In this paper the effect of membrane fouling on rejection is presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of particular concern in water treatment is the removal of natural organic matter (NOM) which contains potential disinfection by-product precursors. The presence of colloids, multivalent ions and organics in surface waters may cause substantial fouling of membranes.A study was carried out which looked at the rejection abilities of a range of membranes targeting hematite colloids (40-500nm), NOM and cations, fouling conditions and cost of treatment of these processes with consideration of chemical pretreatment with ferric chloride [1]. In this paper the effect of membrane fouling on rejection is presented.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrafiltration (UF) membranes permit the removal of colloidal particles, microorganisms and a considerable amount of dissolved organic matter. These membranes have been very widely utilised in drinking water treatment as an alternative technology to conventional methods of purifying water (Schäfer, 2001;Domany et al, 2002;Chang et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2015). NOM, e.g., humic acid, poses serious hindrance to membrane flux (flow of water across a membrane) by adsorbing on the membrane surfaces in a process known as fouling, wherein the pores of the membranes become blocked with time, resulting in a lower flux of water across the membrane (Elimelech et al, 2011;Vankelecom et al, 2003;Särkkä et al, 2015;Yunos et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%