2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jal.2013.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural language semantics in biproduct dagger categories

Abstract: Biproduct dagger categories serve as models for natural language. In particular, the biproduct dagger category of finite dimensional vector spaces over the field of real numbers accommodates both the extensional models of predicate calculus and the intensional models of quantum logic. The morphisms representing the extensional meanings of a grammatical string are translated to morphisms representing the intensional meanings such that truth is preserved. Pregroup grammars serve as the tool that transforms a gra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extending the theory to other sets of subsets, for example, down or up sets, rather than the full powerset is a future direction, as is developing a logic based on any of these collections (powerset vs down or up sets). Extending the grammar to more expressive fragments of English and addressing advanced language phenomena such as co-reference resolution, following the work of Preller (2014), are other future directions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extending the theory to other sets of subsets, for example, down or up sets, rather than the full powerset is a future direction, as is developing a logic based on any of these collections (powerset vs down or up sets). Extending the grammar to more expressive fragments of English and addressing advanced language phenomena such as co-reference resolution, following the work of Preller (2014), are other future directions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We write G for the free rigid category that it generates, also called the lexical category in [6]. An arrow r : u → s for an utterance u ∈ List(V ) is a proof that u is a grammatical sentence, i.e.…”
Section: Definition 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that our de nition of the lexical category G di ers slightly from [6] in that we take not only basic types b ∈ B but also words w ∈ V as generating objects. This allows us to capture both type assignment and reduction as a single arrow as well as to de ne the semantics of pregroup grammars as a functor, see de nition 3.2 where we will also make use of the following lemma.…”
Section: Definition 18 Parsingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations