2019
DOI: 10.1080/14702541.2019.1610571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural flood management: small-scale progress and larger-scale challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limited quantitative data associated with implementation of NBS at the large catchment scale is still a major barrier to making the case for CSE (Wilkinson et al, 2019). This is beginning to be addressed through larger catchment projects such as the Eddleston and EA pilot projects (including the 100 km 2 Upper Weardale demonstrator) in the United Kingdom (HM Gov, 2017;Tweed Forum, 2017).…”
Section: Cse Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limited quantitative data associated with implementation of NBS at the large catchment scale is still a major barrier to making the case for CSE (Wilkinson et al, 2019). This is beginning to be addressed through larger catchment projects such as the Eddleston and EA pilot projects (including the 100 km 2 Upper Weardale demonstrator) in the United Kingdom (HM Gov, 2017;Tweed Forum, 2017).…”
Section: Cse Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proposed that a more holistic catchment based approach is required, that includes the adoption of both structural and non‐structural methods (Pitt, ). Natural Flood Management (NFM) is being widely promoted as a non‐structural measure for reducing flood risk (European Commission, ; Scottish Government, 2019; Wilkinson, Addy, Quinn, & Stutter, ). NFM is defined as the alteration, restoration or use of landscape features to reduce flood risk (POST, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is limited empirical evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of NFM interventions in reducing flood hazard at scales greater than ~10 km 2 (Dadson et al, ; Wilkinson et al, ), particularly for measures that promote online and offline temporary storage (Environment Agency, ). Wide‐ranging reviews of the impacts of rural land use and management practices have concluded that although changes in runoff can be significant at the field/plot scale, evidence of changes being transferred to downstream flood sites is lacking (McIntyre et al, ; O'Connell, Ewen, O'Donnell, & Quinn, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NBS in the UK focussed on water management have typically been applied in a flooding context (Lane, 2017;Nicholson, Wilkinson, O'Donnell, & Quinn, 2012;Wilkinson, Addy, Quinn, & Stutter, 2019) but may also be suitable for drought mitigation (Hartmann & Slavíková, 2019;Sapiano, Schembri, & Brincat, 2013). Measures may include the building of bunds or barriers to temporarily store water allowing time for infiltration, more commonly applied in small-scale managed aquifer recharge projects (Escalante, Sebastián Sauto, & Gil, 2019;Glendenning & Vervoort, 2011), or cross-slope planting to capture snow during winter (Kravčík et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%