2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural circulation solar thermal system for water disinfection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average costs are within 2.24 and 6.80 €/m 3 . According to the authors in [11], if a flow-through pasteurisation system produced 200 L/m 2 /day, the treatment cost could be as low as 1 $/m 3 .…”
Section: Results-exergo-economic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The average costs are within 2.24 and 6.80 €/m 3 . According to the authors in [11], if a flow-through pasteurisation system produced 200 L/m 2 /day, the treatment cost could be as low as 1 $/m 3 .…”
Section: Results-exergo-economic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average costs are within 2.24 and 6.80 €/m 3 . According to the authors in [11], if a flow- The weighted arithmetic mean of the specific costs of purified water for each location are reported in row 6 of Table 3; the weights are taken as the amounts of treated water produced in a month. In other words, these are the values of the annual average specific cost of treated water (in €/m 3 ).…”
Section: Results-exergo-economic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A solar system for disinfection of water, to be applied in developing countries and/or long-term emergencies was presented. The system used commercial solar thermal collectors arranged in a selfcompensating natural circulation system, using no electricity and sized for adequate residence time for disinfection by pasteurization (Manfrida et al, 2017). A 5-L reactor was designed and used to enhance the sunlight/visible-lightdriven photocatalytic disinfection efficiency towards gramnegative bacterium (E. coli).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%