2002
DOI: 10.1063/1.1462844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Native defects and self-diffusion in GaSb

Abstract: The native defects in GaSb have been studied with first-principles total-energy calculations. We report the structures and the formation energies of the stable defects and estimate the defect concentrations under different growth conditions. The most important native defect is the Ga Sb antisite, which acts as an acceptor. The other important defects are the acceptor-type Ga vacancy and the donor-type Ga interstitial. The Sb vacancies and interstitials are found to have much higher formation energies. A metast… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

15
77
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
15
77
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…9,10 The density functional theory ͑DFT͒ study of Hakala et al 9 was consistent with the conclusions of Bracht et al 6,7 in that the dominant native defects are the Ga interstitial ͑Ga i ͒, the Ga vacancy ͑V Ga ͒, and Ga antisite ͑Ga Sb ͒.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9,10 The density functional theory ͑DFT͒ study of Hakala et al 9 was consistent with the conclusions of Bracht et al 6,7 in that the dominant native defects are the Ga interstitial ͑Ga i ͒, the Ga vacancy ͑V Ga ͒, and Ga antisite ͑Ga Sb ͒.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Under intrinsic conditions e is approximated by one-half of the energy of the band gap ͑E g ͒. The temperature ͑T͒ dependence of the band gap is given by 32 Table I represents the Hakala et al 9 formation energies of native defects in GaSb for Ga-rich ͑⌬ = ⌬H f = 0.43 eV͒ and Sb-rich ͑⌬ = ⌬H f = −0.43 eV͒ conditions under intrinsic conditions ͑ e = E g / 2͒. To quantify the temperature dependence of the concentration of isolated defects ͓D͔, we used the relation ͓D͔ = N s exp͑−E f / k B T͒, where N s is the density of sublattice sites ͑1.75ϫ 10 22 cm −3 ͒, E f is the formation energy of the defect, and k B is Boltzmann's constant.…”
Section: B Formation Energy Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3͑a͒, the peak at lower energy, ϳ 1660 nm, has been attributed to the Ga Sb acceptor to conduction-band transition. 28,29 In Fig. 3͑b͒, the peaks at lower energy, ϳ 1551 and 1598 nm, are attributed to substrate band-to-band recombination ͑1551 nm͒ and to transitions of free electrons to neutral native acceptors ͑1598 nm͒.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material can be lattice matched with III-V compounds to form a substrate material for various optical communication devices. Furthermore, GaSb has high electron mobility and saturation velocity, which can be utilized in high electron mobility transistors [2]. To some extent, GaSb is a well known compound.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes GaSb useful in the fabrication of infrared detectors and sources. GaSb has a melting point of approximately 700 K [1,2,3,4]. The material can be lattice matched with III-V compounds to form a substrate material for various optical communication devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%