Abstract:Exosomes are extracellular vesicles which carry specific molecular information from donor cells and act as an intercellular communication vehicle, which have emerged as a novel cell-free strategy for the treatment of many diseases including inflammatory disease. Recently, rising studies have developed exosome-based strategies for novel inflammation therapy due to their biocompatibility and bioactivity. Researchers not only use native exosomes as therapeutic agents for inflammation, but also strive to make up f… Show more
“…Similar to the cells, the mechanisms responsible for the therapeutic effects of the EVs in the context of different inflammatory diseases are reducing the microglia/macrophage activation, oxidative stress, pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine release, T-cell activation, tissue fibrosis, viral infectivity, immune cell infiltration, and apoptosis/necrosis ( 146 ). Moreover, EVs regulate M1/M2 macrophage polarization for the benefit of M2 cells, induce collagen regeneration, and prevent scar generation ( 181 ).…”
Section: Msc-evs Vs Mscs: Open Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having mentioned these differences, EVs generally have some clinically relevant superiorities to cell therapy ( 185 , 264 , 265 ). The immune rejection rate of EVs is considerably low compared to the producer cells ( 181 ), so they have an increased half-life and are more stable in circulation ( 39 ). EVs demonstrate an innate tropism to specific tissues ( 76 ) and exert cell-targeting properties ( 111 ).…”
Section: Msc-evs Vs Mscs: Open Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EVs demonstrate an innate tropism to specific tissues ( 76 ) and exert cell-targeting properties ( 111 ). Unlike cells, there is no concern regarding the possibility of necrosis or their abnormal differentiation ( 181 ). They do not show self-replicative and tumor-formation properties ( 139 ) and are not seriously affected by the surrounding inflammatory microenvironment ( 186 ).…”
Section: Msc-evs Vs Mscs: Open Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More translational examples of the application of EVs to facilitate personalized cancer therapeutic methods were provided by a previous publication ( 304 ). Also, the other recent review summarized most of the available examples regarding the administration of native and engineered EVs from various sources, including MSCs, immune, and tissue-specific cells for inflammation therapy in different tissues such as brain, eye, lung, heart, liver, bowel, bone, and skin ( 181 ).…”
Section: Evs From Modified Cells and Ev Modification Strategiesmentioning
The conventional therapeutic approaches to treat autoimmune diseases through suppressing the immune system, such as steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, are not adequately practical. Moreover, these regimens are associated with considerable complications. Designing tolerogenic therapeutic strategies based on stem cells, immune cells, and their extracellular vesicles (EVs) seems to open a promising path to managing autoimmune diseases’ vast burden. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs), dendritic cells, and regulatory T cells (Tregs) are the main cell types applied to restore a tolerogenic immune status; MSCs play a more beneficial role due to their amenable properties and extensive cross-talks with different immune cells. With existing concerns about the employment of cells, new cell-free therapeutic paradigms, such as EV-based therapies, are gaining attention in this field. Additionally, EVs’ unique properties have made them to be known as smart immunomodulators and are considered as a potential substitute for cell therapy. This review provides an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of cell-based and EV-based methods for treating autoimmune diseases. The study also presents an outlook on the future of EVs to be implemented in clinics for autoimmune patients.
“…Similar to the cells, the mechanisms responsible for the therapeutic effects of the EVs in the context of different inflammatory diseases are reducing the microglia/macrophage activation, oxidative stress, pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine release, T-cell activation, tissue fibrosis, viral infectivity, immune cell infiltration, and apoptosis/necrosis ( 146 ). Moreover, EVs regulate M1/M2 macrophage polarization for the benefit of M2 cells, induce collagen regeneration, and prevent scar generation ( 181 ).…”
Section: Msc-evs Vs Mscs: Open Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having mentioned these differences, EVs generally have some clinically relevant superiorities to cell therapy ( 185 , 264 , 265 ). The immune rejection rate of EVs is considerably low compared to the producer cells ( 181 ), so they have an increased half-life and are more stable in circulation ( 39 ). EVs demonstrate an innate tropism to specific tissues ( 76 ) and exert cell-targeting properties ( 111 ).…”
Section: Msc-evs Vs Mscs: Open Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EVs demonstrate an innate tropism to specific tissues ( 76 ) and exert cell-targeting properties ( 111 ). Unlike cells, there is no concern regarding the possibility of necrosis or their abnormal differentiation ( 181 ). They do not show self-replicative and tumor-formation properties ( 139 ) and are not seriously affected by the surrounding inflammatory microenvironment ( 186 ).…”
Section: Msc-evs Vs Mscs: Open Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More translational examples of the application of EVs to facilitate personalized cancer therapeutic methods were provided by a previous publication ( 304 ). Also, the other recent review summarized most of the available examples regarding the administration of native and engineered EVs from various sources, including MSCs, immune, and tissue-specific cells for inflammation therapy in different tissues such as brain, eye, lung, heart, liver, bowel, bone, and skin ( 181 ).…”
Section: Evs From Modified Cells and Ev Modification Strategiesmentioning
The conventional therapeutic approaches to treat autoimmune diseases through suppressing the immune system, such as steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, are not adequately practical. Moreover, these regimens are associated with considerable complications. Designing tolerogenic therapeutic strategies based on stem cells, immune cells, and their extracellular vesicles (EVs) seems to open a promising path to managing autoimmune diseases’ vast burden. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs), dendritic cells, and regulatory T cells (Tregs) are the main cell types applied to restore a tolerogenic immune status; MSCs play a more beneficial role due to their amenable properties and extensive cross-talks with different immune cells. With existing concerns about the employment of cells, new cell-free therapeutic paradigms, such as EV-based therapies, are gaining attention in this field. Additionally, EVs’ unique properties have made them to be known as smart immunomodulators and are considered as a potential substitute for cell therapy. This review provides an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of cell-based and EV-based methods for treating autoimmune diseases. The study also presents an outlook on the future of EVs to be implemented in clinics for autoimmune patients.
“…Studies have shown that exosomes are closely related to the development of diseases. [64,65] The main method of detecting exosomes reported now is fluorescence detection, however, the strong autofluorescence signals in the plasma and the culture medium (mostly emit from the emissive biomolecules, such as hemoglobin, flavin, and lipofuscin) can interfere the measurements, during fluorescence detection. To avoid this [51] Copyright (2020), The Author(s).…”
Organic afterglow nanoparticles are unique optical materials that emit light long after cessation of excitation. Due to their advantages of no need for real-time light excitation, avoiding autofluorescence, low imaging background, high signal-to-background ratio, deep tissue penetration, and high sensitivity, afterglow imaging technology has been widely used in cell tracking, biosensing, cancer diagnosis, and cancer therapy, which provides an effective technical method for the acquisition of molecular information with high sensitivity, specificity and real-time at the cellular and living level. In this review, we summarize and illustrate the recent progress of organic afterglow imaging, focusing on the mechanism of organic afterglow materials and their biological application. Furthermore, we also discuss the potential challenges and the further directions of this field.
Inspired by the experience of relieving inflammation in infants with milk, we have developed antioxidant‐engineered milk‐derived extracellular vesicles (MEVs) to evaluate their potential for accelerating wound healing. In this work, we engineered MEVs with polydopamines (PDA) using the co‐extrusion method. Subsequently, we incorporated them into a Schiff‐based crosslink hydrogel, forming a skin dosage form that could facilitate the wound healing process. The antioxidant properties of PDA assist in the anti‐inflammatory function of engineered MEVs, while the gel provides better skin residency. The PDA@MEVs+GEL formulation exhibited excellent biocompatibility, pro‐angiogenic capacity, and antioxidant ability in vitro. Furthermore, in vivo, experiments demonstrated its efficacy in wound repair and inflammation inhibition. Mechanistically, PDA@MEVs+GEL simultaneously promoted the growth, migration, and anti‐inflammation of 3T3 cells by activating PI3K‐AKT pathway. Moreover, PDA@MEVs+GEL exhibited enhanced functionality in promoting wound healing in vivo, attributed to its ability to inhibit inflammation, stimulate angiogenesis, and promote collagen synthesis. In conclusion, this study delves into the mechanism of MEVs and underscores the improved efficacy of engineered extracellular vesicles. Additionally, the feasibility and prospect of engineered MEVs in treating skin wounds were verified, suggesting that antioxidant‐engineered MEVs could be a promising therapeutic agent for wound healing applications.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.