National Varieties of Public–Private Partnerships (PPPs): A Comparative Analysis of PPP-Supporting Units in 19 European Countries

Hurk, Martijn van den; Brogaard, Lena; Lember, Veiko; Petersen, Ole Helby; Witz, Petr

doi:10.1080/13876988.2015.1006814

Cited by 45 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…IPs performance requirements of individual sectors projects differ from sector to sector therefore requiring a different management approach [33]. However, proper policy guidelines and institutional establishments promote PPP implementation [34]. Arguably, PPPs implementation differs between different countries depending on country's institutional frameworks [35] and country characteristics [34].…”

Section: IVmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, proper policy guidelines and institutional establishments promote PPP implementation [34]. Arguably, PPPs implementation differs between different countries depending on country's institutional frameworks [35] and country characteristics [34]. The goal is to identify countries and sectors broader strategies that fit these country and sector characteristics [13].…”

Section: IVmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Developing A Public Private Partnership Performance Framework for Transport and Health Sector Stakeholders in the UK and Ghana

Donkoh

Murphy

Eadie

2017

Fifth International Conference on Advances in Civil, Structural and Mechanical Engineering - CSM 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Public Private Partnerships (PPP) have been used in the construction industry to deliver critical infrastructure projects in various sectors. PPPs performance improvement is a current stakeholder concern due to numerous project failures. This research compares PPPs transport and health sector infrastructure in the United Kingdom and Ghana to produce a sustainable performance improvement model. The research aim is twofold: first, to develop an empirical performance improvement model for PPP best practice implementation for the UK and Ghanaian transport and health sectors. Secondly, it will examine and compare the UK and Ghanaian PPP transport and health sector stakeholders' Critical Success Factors (CSF) and risks. A rigorous literature review on complex IPs was conducted into PPP transport and health sectors to identify stakeholders CSF and risks in infrastructure sector projects. Four (4) Delphi expert panels and statistical analysis will be used to identify the CSF and risks for successful implementation. The proposed research will establish valuable information for the public and private sectors' stakeholder interests when investing in transport and health infrastructure projects through PPP in both the UK and Ghanaian construction industries.

show abstract

Section: IVmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: IVmentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing A Public Private Partnership Performance Framework for Transport and Health Sector Stakeholders in the UK and Ghana

Donkoh

Murphy

Eadie

2017

Fifth International Conference on Advances in Civil, Structural and Mechanical Engineering - CSM 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The EU member states have used PPPs (both traditional and negotiating) differently; at the European level there is a prevalence of TPPPs compared to NPPPs [2,4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In Italy, instead, most of the real estate initiatives (both greenfield and brownfield), as implemented by the majority of Municipalities/Local Governments/local authorities over the years, have been based on NPPPs [4][5][6][7]: new planning tools-the so-called complex programs (Established by national law no. 179/1992 and subsequently regulated by the regions with specific laws) (integrated intervention programs, urban redevelopment programs, and urban rehabilitation programs)-have been encoded to meet the needs of PPPs, with particular reference to NPPPs.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Methodology for Determining the Profitability Index of Real Estate Initiatives Involving Public–Private Partnerships. A Case Study: The Integrated Intervention Programs in Rome

Battisti

Campo

2019

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the European Union, real estate initiatives involving public–private partnerships (PPPs) are characterized by the payment of a charge, which is generally used for public purposes (and works). In Italy, since the 1990s, PPPs have also been used to start negotiated initiatives giving the possibility of modifying town planning forecasts. Such initiatives are aimed at increasing the value of private properties and, through the charge, financing public works. This charge was regulated only in 2014 with the change of Article 16, paragraph 4, point d-ter of the Presidential Decree 380/2001 (Consolidated building law) and was named the “extraordinary urbanization contribution” (or simply the “extraordinary contribution”). The extraordinary contribution makes it possible to finance public works with private monetary resources. The amount of the extraordinary contribution is not less than 50% of the capital gain that is produced by real estate initiatives concerning modifications to town planning forecasts. A crucial issue of the this kind of PPPs has always been the appraisal of the capital gain of real estate initiatives due to changes in town planning forecasts. The factors to be considered while evaluating the extraordinary contribution, the appraisal tools and procedures to be used in assessing the capital gain are not indicated at regulatory level. However, an over 20 years’ practice has been consolidating the use of an analytical procedure for the appraisal of the transformation value to be used in evaluating the extraordinary contribution. In this procedure, the evaluation of the profitability index of real estate initiatives appears critical: in fact, the capital gain depends upon this element. At the same time, this topic is substantially neglected by the scientific debate. In this paper, a methodology has been defined, which is structured on the Build-Up Method and allows the profitability index (or rate of return) of a real estate initiative to be evaluated. Through a test, the developed methodology has been used in a case study: the appraisal of the extraordinary contribution in three integrated intervention programs in the city of Rome.

show abstract

From paper to practice: an exploratory study of policy making and implementation in alternative forms of healthcare public‐private partnership in Ghana

Dugle

Kpinpuo

Ghartey

2021

Health Planning & Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There has been growing advocacy for public-private partnership (PPP) in healthcare in both policy and academic circles over the last 3 decades. However, our understanding of the tensions between the policy cycle and critical organisational trade-offs that characterise alternative How to cite this article: Dugle G, Kpinpuo SD, Ghartey BB. From paper to practice: an exploratory study of policy making and implementation in alternative forms of healthcare public-private partnership in Ghana. Int

show abstract

National Varieties of Public–Private Partnerships (PPPs): A Comparative Analysis of PPP-Supporting Units in 19 European Countries

Cited by 45 publications

References 36 publications

Developing A Public Private Partnership Performance Framework for Transport and Health Sector Stakeholders in the UK and Ghana

Developing A Public Private Partnership Performance Framework for Transport and Health Sector Stakeholders in the UK and Ghana

A Methodology for Determining the Profitability Index of Real Estate Initiatives Involving Public–Private Partnerships. A Case Study: The Integrated Intervention Programs in Rome

From paper to practice: an exploratory study of policy making and implementation in alternative forms of healthcare public‐private partnership in Ghana

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About