2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-011-1796-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National Trends in Ambulatory Asthma Treatment, 1997–2009

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(5 reference statements)
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, when measured using the ratio of LTC-Rx claims to total asthma drug claims, LTC-Rx adherence was associated with a 23.0% lower likelihood of having an asthma exacerbation (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.77 [95% CI, 0.75–0.80]) [24]. National survey data indicate that this ratio has increased across the US population of persons with asthma from 0.5 in 1997 to a peak of 0.7 in 2004 [25]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, when measured using the ratio of LTC-Rx claims to total asthma drug claims, LTC-Rx adherence was associated with a 23.0% lower likelihood of having an asthma exacerbation (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.77 [95% CI, 0.75–0.80]) [24]. National survey data indicate that this ratio has increased across the US population of persons with asthma from 0.5 in 1997 to a peak of 0.7 in 2004 [25]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We limited our analyses to the approximately 85% of contacts generated through office visits. Previous studies have compared the NDTI with the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a nationally representative survey conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics; these studies have suggested that both data sources provide similar estimates of office-based medication use (26–28). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis was not designed to distinguish between clinically appropriate use and overuse of the medicines examined, because data that would allow for such inferences (e.g., detailed information regarding patients' histories, diagnoses, comorbid conditions, treatment failures, and preferences) were not available to us. Both underuse and overuse of therapies, such as those that we examined, have been previously documented (12,29), and as with provider-targeted pharmaceutical advertising, the evidence regarding DTCA's impact is mixed (30). Despite this, the preponderance of evidence suggests that pharmaceutical advertising is associated with increased prescribing frequency, higher costs, or lower quality as assessed by concordance with clinical guidelines (7,31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We examined the association between DTCA, asthma medication sales, and asthma-related healthcare use by linking data capturing household exposure to DTCA to two separate datasets: the IMS Health National Prescription Audit (pharmacy sales) and the MarketScan Commercial Claims database (prescription and nonprescription healthcare use). We focused on asthma because of its high prevalence and cost (12,13). We hypothesized that DTCA exposure would be associated with increases in the market share for advertised drugs, expansion of the overall therapeutic class of advertised products, and increases in asthma-related healthcare use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%