National Survey of Oncologists at National Cancer Institute–Designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers: Attitudes, Knowledge, and Practice Behaviors About LGBTQ Patients With Cancer

Abstract

PURPOSE To identify potential gaps in attitudes, knowledge, and institutional practices toward lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ) patients, a national survey of oncologists at National Cancer Institute–Designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers was conducted to measure these attributes related to LGBTQ patients and desire for future training and education. METHODS A random sample of 450 oncologists from 45 cancer centers was selected from the American Medical Association’s Physician Masterfile to complete a survey measuring attitudes and knowledge about LGBTQ health and institutional practices. Results were quantified using descriptive and stratified analyses and by a novel attitude summary measure. RESULTS Of the 149 respondents, there was high agreement (65.8%) regarding the importance of knowing the gender identity of patients, which was contrasted by low agreement (39.6%) regarding the importance of knowing sexual orientation. There was high interest in receiving education regarding the unique health needs of LGBTQ patients (70.4%), and knowledge questions yielded high percentages of “neutral” and “do not know or prefer not to answer” responses. After completing the survey, there was a significant decrease ( P < .001) in confidence in knowledge of health needs for LGB (53.1% agreed they were confident during survey assessment v 38.9% postsurvey) and transgender patients (36.9% v 19.5% postsurvey). Stratified analyses revealed some but limited influence on attitudes and knowledge by having LGBTQ friends and/or family members, political affiliation, oncology specialty, years since graduation, and respondents’ region of the country. CONCLUSION This was the first nationwide study, to our knowledge, of oncologists assessing attitudes, knowledge, and institutional practices of LGBTQ patients with cancer. Overall, there was limited knowledge about LGBTQ health and cancer needs but a high interest in receiving education regarding this community.

Care delivery, patient experiences, and health outcomes among sexual and gender minority patients with cancer and survivors: A scoping review

“…Several gaps in content areas readily covered in other disparity populations, including experiences of health care discrimination, access to care, and stigma, have received little research attention for SGM cancer populations, despite the inclusion of SGM as a health disparity population . Nearly all the research in this review covered SM, not GM (transgender, nonbinary gender) groups; this is a major gap in the literature, as has been previously suggested . In addition, construct development and measurement of topics salient to cancer survivors have not been fully explored in the SGM population .…”

Web‐based LGBT cultural competency training intervention for oncologists: Pilot study results

“…Recent studies of LGBT competency among oncologists in the United States have shown that oncologists have a high level of interest in receiving LGBT cancer health education, and showed overall limited knowledge of LGBT cancer health needs . This is problematic, as the number of people who identify as LGBT is growing, as are the number of cancer diagnoses in the United States . Based on conservative estimates, there may be over 1 million LGBT cancer survivors living in the United States …”

“…This is problematic, as the number of people who identify as LGBT is growing, as are the number of cancer diagnoses in the United States . Based on conservative estimates, there may be over 1 million LGBT cancer survivors living in the United States …”

Surveillance of cancer among sexual and gender minority populations: Where are we and where do we need to go?

“…A national study showed that 78% of clinicians felt that their patients would refuse to disclose their SGM status, in stark contrast to only 10% of patients reporting that they would refuse to disclose their status, citing improved individualized care as a benefit to disclosure . In a recent national survey of nearly 150 oncologists from National Cancer Institute‐designated cancer centers across the United States, Schabath and colleagues measured the attitudes, knowledge, institutional practice behaviors, and interest in education on the care of LGBTQ patients with cancer . They found that although a majority of oncologists, approximately two‐thirds, felt that it was important to know a patient's gender identity, only about one‐third felt that it was relevant to them to know of the patient's sexual orientation.…”