2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National scale assessment of climate change impacts on flooding in Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
149
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
149
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The work shows that the non-linearity of the rainfall-runoff transformation and the propagation of the climate-to-flood change signal can be estimated with some degree of success by a set of climatic and physical catchment properties. Up to now, the role of the catchment in its response to climatic change has often been implicit and less investigated in climate change impact and adaptation studies than the climate change signal itself (see for example Kay et al, 2009;Veijalainen et al, 2010;Vidal and Wade, 2009). This deficiency was recognised by Ntelekos et al (2010), but while they clearly identified the major role the level and type of urbanisation has on the sensitivity of an area to climatic changes, they did not attempt to formally link the response of a catchment to its physical (and non physical) characteristics and only evaluated the impact of a few scenarios (derived from climate models) on flooding.…”
Section: Hydrological Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work shows that the non-linearity of the rainfall-runoff transformation and the propagation of the climate-to-flood change signal can be estimated with some degree of success by a set of climatic and physical catchment properties. Up to now, the role of the catchment in its response to climatic change has often been implicit and less investigated in climate change impact and adaptation studies than the climate change signal itself (see for example Kay et al, 2009;Veijalainen et al, 2010;Vidal and Wade, 2009). This deficiency was recognised by Ntelekos et al (2010), but while they clearly identified the major role the level and type of urbanisation has on the sensitivity of an area to climatic changes, they did not attempt to formally link the response of a catchment to its physical (and non physical) characteristics and only evaluated the impact of a few scenarios (derived from climate models) on flooding.…”
Section: Hydrological Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an important finding, especially regarding rivers with strong backwater effects during flood events. The effects of flood events on river evolution should get more attention in future studies, as flood regimes are expected to change along with the changing climate, especially in high altitudes and latitudes [60].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was because the hydrological models did not adequately highlight the most extreme events that were experienced. This might be a consequence of the use of too narrow selection of global or regional climate models, as Veijalainen et al [27] present or the use of insufficient methods to estimate the probability of extreme weather events [39]. Nevertheless, it seems that the main risks can be best recognized by analysing the extreme weather events of past decades and years, together with studying the possible climate change impacts on seasonal variations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 presents the schematic figure of the method used for assessing floods by taking into account the climate scenarios. For this case study, the hydrological models were simulated using two regional climate model scenarios (HadCM3 global model & A1B emission scenario, and ECHAM5 global model & A1B and A2 emission scenario) [27,28].…”
Section: Flood Assessment In Finlandmentioning
confidence: 99%