Contact CEH NORA team at noraceh@ceh.ac.ukThe NERC and CEH trademarks and logos ('the Trademarks') are registered trademarks of NERC in the UK and other countries, and may not be used without the prior written consent of the Trademark owner. precipitation set a record (Fig. 3a). Sustained high precipitation amounts 60 during the whole winter led to this record, rather than a few very wet days, Human influence on climate in the 2014 Southern 61and none of the 5-day precipitation averages over the three winter months 62 was a record (Fig. 3b). Similarly, while Thames' daily peak river flows were 63 not exceptional, the 30-day peak flow was the second highest since 64 measurements began in 1883 ( Supplementary Fig. 10 to provide a conservative estimate of uncertainty. 106We consider January precipitation and SLP, with Southern England 107Precipitation (SEP) averaged over land grid points in 50º-52ºN, 6.5ºW-2ºE. 189In the large RCM ensemble, the best estimate for the overall change in risk of is an increase of 43%, with a range from no change to 164% increase 192 associated with uncertainty in the pattern of anthropogenic warming (Fig. 5d). rainfall that we simulate is less on timescales that dominate flooding in this 252 catchment, consistent with the mechanism being an increase in the frequency 253 of the zonal regime, and so, successions of strong but fast-moving storms. 254Outputs from CLASSIC are combined with information about the location of

This paper presents a novel framework for undertaking robust climate change impact studies, which can be used for testing the robustness of precautionary climate change allowances used in engineering design. It is illustrated with respect to fluvial flood risk in the UK. The methodology departs from conventional scenario-led impact studies because it is based on sensitivity analyses of catchment responses to a plausible range of climate changes (rather than the time-varying outcome of individual scenarios), making it scenarioneutral. The method involves separating the climate change projections (the hazard) from the catchment responsiveness (the vulnerability) expressed as changes in peak flows. By combining current understanding of likelihood of the climate change hazard with knowledge of the sensitivity of a given catchment, it is possible to evaluate the fraction of climate model projections that would not be accommodated by specified safety margins. This enables rapid appraisal of existing or new precautionary allowances for a set of climate change projections, but also for any new set of climate change projections for example arising from a new generation of climate models as soon as they are available, or when focusing on a different planning time horizon, without the need for undertaking a new climate change impact analysis with the new scenarios. The approach is demonstrated via an assessment of the UK Government's 20% allowance for climate change applied in two contrasting catchments. In these exemplars, the allowance defends against the majority of sampled climate projections for the 2080s from the IPCC-AR4 GCM and UKCP09 RCM runs but it is still possible to identify a subset of regional scenarios that would exceed the 20% threshold.

Abstract:The issues of downscaling the results from global climate models (GCMs) to a scale relevant for hydrological impact studies are examined. GCM outputs, typically at a spatial resolution of around 3°latitude and 4°longitude, are currently not considered reliable at time scales shorter than 1 month. Continuous rainfall-runoff modelling for flood regime assessment requires input at the daily or even hourly time-step. A review of the different methodologies suggested in the literature to downscale GCM results at smaller spatial and temporal resolutions is presented. The methods, from simple interpolation to more sophisticated dynamical modelling, through multiple regression and weather generators, are, however, mostly based directly on GCM outputs, sometimes at daily time-step. The approach adopted is a simple, empirical methodology based on modelled monthly changes from the HadCM2 greenhouse gases experiment for the time horizon 2050s. Three daily rainfall scenarios are derived from the same set of monthly changes, representing different possible changes in the rainfall regime. The first scenario represents an increase of the occurrence of frontal systems, corresponding to a decrease in the rainfall intensity; the second corresponds to an increase in convective storm-type rainfall, characterized by extreme events with higher intensity; the third one assumes an increase in the monthly rainfall without any change in rainfall variability. A continuous daily rainfall-runoff model, calibrated for the Severn catchment, was used to generate daily flow series for the 1961-90 baseline period and the 2050s, and a peaks-over-threshold analysis was undertaken to produce flood frequency distributions for the two time horizons. Though the three scenarios lead to an increase in the magnitude and the frequency of the extreme flood events, the impact is strongly influenced by the type of daily rainfall scenario applied. We conclude that if the next generation of GCMs produce more reliable rainfall variance estimates, then more appropriate ways of deriving rainfall scenarios could be developed using weather generators rather than empirical methods.

Evaporation is an important component of the hydrological cycle. Potential evaporation (PE) from a vegetated surface is the amount of water that would be lost to the atmosphere were the supply unlimited; actual evaporation (AE) is a fraction of PE dependent on soil wetness. Many formulae exist for estimating PE from meteorological data. PE is usually a required input, with rainfall, for hydrological modelling, but PE accuracy is generally considered less important than rainfall accuracy for model performance. Few studies investigate historical evaporation trends in Britain, but generally indicate increases. Most studies presenting future PE projections for Britain indicate increased annual PE, but some suggest small decreases in some months. Limited consensus on the best formulae to derive PE projections from climate model data is further complicated by possible changes in plant behaviour (transpiration and growth) under higher carbon dioxide concentrations.Appropriate PE estimation could be particularly important in regions where precipitation and PE are in close balance, but PE uncertainty could be less important than climate model uncertainty for hydrological impacts. Further research is needed into which PE formulae are likely to be most reliable when applied with climate model data, and into climate change and plant feedbacks.

No abstract