2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.repce.2013.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National Registry on Cardiac Electrophysiology (2010 and 2011)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[16][17][18] Endocardial ablation of ventricular arrhythmias is performed in a large number of centers, but some ventricular arrhythmias can better be ablated from the epicardial side. 19,20 An epicardial approach, however, is associated with severe complications like cardiac tamponade, ventricular arrhythmias, phrenic nerve damage, and damage to the coronary arteries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18] Endocardial ablation of ventricular arrhythmias is performed in a large number of centers, but some ventricular arrhythmias can better be ablated from the epicardial side. 19,20 An epicardial approach, however, is associated with severe complications like cardiac tamponade, ventricular arrhythmias, phrenic nerve damage, and damage to the coronary arteries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AF accounted for 26% of interventions, for the first time exceeding atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (25%), followed by atrioventricular accessory pathways (20%) and atrial flutter (17.4%), similar percentages to previous years. 2 Ablation of ventricular arrhythmia and atrial tachycardia remained uncommon indications (≤5% each), despite technical advances in the procedure and improved success rates with the use of three-dimensional mapping systems. Atrioventricular junction ablation continued to be the least frequent intervention (3.1%), although this represents an increase of 1%, probably due to its indication for patients with permanent AF treated by ventricular resynchronization therapy for heart failure.…”
Section: Electrophysiologic Studies and Catheter Ablationsmentioning
confidence: 99%