2018
DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National Project Management Maturity: A Conceptual Framework

Abstract: This paper extends the concept of organizational project management maturity to the national context. Based on a review of the extant literature and a thorough analysis of existing organizational maturity models, it develops a systematic framework of national project management maturity and the national project management maturity model (NPM3), by defining maturity levels, identifying key maturity perspectives and drivers, and discussing key performance indicators that may be used to assess and compare nationa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(18 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to the fact that the organizations surveyed may not have the requisite resources and thus do not see the need for implementing PMFs. The insignificance of OM in this study corroborates other (Farrokh & Mansur, 2013;Gomes & Romão, 2014;Mettler, 2011;Spruit & Pietzka, 2015) Seelhofer & Graf, 2018 .…”
Section: Omsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be due to the fact that the organizations surveyed may not have the requisite resources and thus do not see the need for implementing PMFs. The insignificance of OM in this study corroborates other (Farrokh & Mansur, 2013;Gomes & Romão, 2014;Mettler, 2011;Spruit & Pietzka, 2015) Seelhofer & Graf, 2018 .…”
Section: Omsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It is important noting that many scholars have used OM in their work in other to understand where the organization is and when to introduce or implement something new for the organizational benefit (Farrokh & Mansur, 2013;Gomes & Romão, 2014;Mettler, 2011;Seelhofer & Graf, 2018;Spruit & Pietzka, 2015).…”
Section: Development Of Conceptual Framework/hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The too-complex model was inefficient for assessment. As Seelhofer and Graf (2018) suggested, this model only addressed tacit but not implicit project management knowledge areas. Moreover, organizations tend to focus on areas relevant to their needs so as to increase their project management capability.…”
Section: The Pmmm Was Inflexible and Too Complex To Applymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Christoph Albrecht and Spang (2014) identified potential influences on an organization-specific "ideal" level of project management maturity by taking a qualitative and exploratory approach. While Seelhofer and Graf (2018) developed a systematic national project management maturity framework and the national project management maturity model, defining maturity levels, identifying key perspectives and drivers of maturity, and discussing key performance indicators that can be used to assess and compare national project management maturity. In assessing the drivers of project delays in Algeria, Salhi and al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%