2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.asj.2009.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National Interdisciplinary Rhinoplasty

Abstract: There is no uniform consensus regarding general rhinoplasty trends. Subanalysis shows that, overall, there are statistically significant similarities and differences amongst different specialties.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, with that in mind, current literature has revision rates quoted as often times below 5%, but commonly in a 5% to 10% range as well. 16,17 The numbers from this study seem to be similar with the literature at large.…”
Section: Revision Rates and Annual Procedures Performedsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, with that in mind, current literature has revision rates quoted as often times below 5%, but commonly in a 5% to 10% range as well. 16,17 The numbers from this study seem to be similar with the literature at large.…”
Section: Revision Rates and Annual Procedures Performedsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is interesting in comparison with similar studies abroad, which also suggested that experienced rhinologists are significantly less likely to practice packing. 2,3 Although rhinoplasties are clearly common among the surgeons we polled, the total number of operations performed seems to be lower than those in similar surveys. Only 16 surgeons in our poll reported performing more than 40 rhinoplasties per year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…According to a survey of rhinoplasty surgeons in the United States, 58% had revisional rates <5%, whereas 33% had rates from 6% to 10%. 6 Guyuron and Bokhari 5 suggested that low revisional rates may be attributable to open rhinoplasty, which enables better visualization. In our practice, the preferred method of primary or revisional rhinoplasty is using an open approach although a small number of cases would have a closed procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%