2012
DOI: 10.3133/fs20123088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National Enhanced Elevation Assessment at a glance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the U.S., LiDAR data are available for less than 40 percent of the continental states (Snyder, 2012). LiDAR data derived from high point density elevation measurements or smaller post-spacing increase the survey costs and computational time considerably due to handling of vast amount of data, higher sensor pulse rates, and lower flight altitudes (Aguilar et al, 2010;Raber et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the U.S., LiDAR data are available for less than 40 percent of the continental states (Snyder, 2012). LiDAR data derived from high point density elevation measurements or smaller post-spacing increase the survey costs and computational time considerably due to handling of vast amount of data, higher sensor pulse rates, and lower flight altitudes (Aguilar et al, 2010;Raber et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To consider changes that have altered the demand for and supply of remotely sensed imagery, a recent update found that domestic and international users received an estimated $3.45 billion in benefits in 2017, with U.S. users accounting for $2.06 billion of those benefits (Straub and others, 2019). Another USGS study considered the potential benefits of enhanced elevation data, indicating as much as $13 billion in new annual benefits (Snyder, 2012); research on VOI of enhanced elevation data continues. Although stated preference surveys can provide critical information on the uses and value associated with scientific information, this technique is not always feasible due to time and resource constraints.…”
Section: Methods Used To Estimate Voimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original lidar data vertical accuracy was 0.50 ft at a 95-percent confidence level based on a root mean square error of 0.26 ft for the "open terrain" land-cover category. By these criteria, the lidar data supported production of 2-ft contours (Dewberry, 2012). The final DEM had a 3.281-ft grid-cell size and a vertical accuracy of plus or minus 1 ft (U.S. Geological Survey, 2020b).…”
Section: Topographic and Bathymetric Datamentioning
confidence: 98%