2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating the effect of DEM resolution and accuracy for improved flood inundation mapping

Abstract: Topography plays a major role in determining the accuracy of flood inundation areas. However, many areas in the United States and around the world do not have access to high quality topographic data in the form of Digital Elevation Models (DEM). For such areas, an improved understanding of the effects of DEM properties such as horizontal resolution and vertical accuracy on flood inundation maps may eventually lead to improved flood inundation modeling and mapping. This study attempts to relate the errors arisi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
101
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
101
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Altarejos-García et al (2012), Chatterjee et al (2008), Bates (2001, 2002), Kvočka et al (2015), and Neal et al (2012b) discuss the effects of the chosen inundation model, its parametrization, and the role of input data on flood modelling results. Other uncertainties in flood modelling outputs are related to uncertainties in levee heights (Sanyal, 2017) or digital elevation models (Saksena and Merwade, 2015). Beside the uncertainties in flood modelling, observational uncertainties also need to be recognized with recent studies highlighting the importance of observational errors in rainfall and discharge data (McMillan et al, 2012;Coxon et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altarejos-García et al (2012), Chatterjee et al (2008), Bates (2001, 2002), Kvočka et al (2015), and Neal et al (2012b) discuss the effects of the chosen inundation model, its parametrization, and the role of input data on flood modelling results. Other uncertainties in flood modelling outputs are related to uncertainties in levee heights (Sanyal, 2017) or digital elevation models (Saksena and Merwade, 2015). Beside the uncertainties in flood modelling, observational uncertainties also need to be recognized with recent studies highlighting the importance of observational errors in rainfall and discharge data (McMillan et al, 2012;Coxon et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drainage network extracted from the 30 m GDEM and TOPODATA showed a difference in the stream network compared with that extracted from the topographic map. In the floodplain areas, the movement of water is hardly detected using a DEM as it is controlled by very small topographic features, specifically if the mesh size is not fine enough to represent these small features such as narrow channels connecting main rivers and floodplains (Yamazaki et al 2012, Saksena andMerwade 2015). Moreover, the presence of noise and canopy in the DEM highly affect the drainage network in these regions, specifically with small mesh sizes (Lane, James andCrowell 2000, Polidori andSimonetto 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 Altarejos-García et al (2012), Chatterjee et al (2008), Horritt and Bates (2001), Horritt and Bates (2002), Kvočka et al (2015), and Neal et al (2012b) discuss the effects of the chosen inundation model, its parametrization, and the role of input data on flood modelling results. Other uncertainties in flood modelling outputs are related to uncertainties in levee heights (Sanyal, 2017), or in the digital elevation models (Saksena and Merwade, 2015). Beside the uncertainties in flood modelling, observational uncertainties also need to be recognized with recent studies highlighting the importance of observational errors in rainfall and discharge data (McMillan et al, 2012;Coxon et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%