1971
DOI: 10.1080/00022470.1971.10469565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National Air Quality Standards for Automotive Pollutants – A Critical Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…99 -additives. Yet, the gasoline-engine catalytic converter [102][103][104] (the most effective measure for reducing emissions, concentrations, and biomarkers for these pollutants) was originally intended to reduce CO and VOC emissions, then eventually NO x emissions. Gasolineengine Pb reductions were a beneficial (and recognized) byproduct, eventually resulting in the phase-out of Pb additives that contaminated the catalyst and that some claim did not belong there in the first place.…”
Section: Invited Comments By Dr John Watsonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…99 -additives. Yet, the gasoline-engine catalytic converter [102][103][104] (the most effective measure for reducing emissions, concentrations, and biomarkers for these pollutants) was originally intended to reduce CO and VOC emissions, then eventually NO x emissions. Gasolineengine Pb reductions were a beneficial (and recognized) byproduct, eventually resulting in the phase-out of Pb additives that contaminated the catalyst and that some claim did not belong there in the first place.…”
Section: Invited Comments By Dr John Watsonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This EPA strategy, often referred to as the Appendix-J method (2), has been criticized for a number of limitations (3,4), the main ones of which are alleged to be as follows:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate with a specific example, the national ambient air quality standard for carbon monoxide requires that the 8 hr average concentration not exceed 9 parts per million (ppm) more than once per year. Although the stringency of the standard has been questioned, 3 the goal of meeting the standard will be accepted for the purposes of this paper, and only the question of what automotive emission rate is needed to meet this standard will be considered. Carbon monoxide has been chosen as an example because in most large cities, nearly all of it can be ascribed to vehicular activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%