1974
DOI: 10.1080/00022470.1974.10469980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Approach to Setting Vehicle Emission Standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 5 it is seen that for the 99 "station-years" of New Jersey CO data (1968-73) the relationship between the standard deviation and annual average has a slope of 0.56 (i.e., coefficient of variation is 0.56) which is a little larger than the 0.49 observed in the CAMP data. 2 The standard deviation-annual average relationship for the 1972 U.S. data (82 stations) had a slope of 0.53 which was not significantly different from 0.5. Figure 6 shows that for the New Jersey data the annual average is a good predictor of the percent of the time the CO standard is exceeded.…”
Section: Relationship Between Annual Average and Percent Of Time The mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In Figure 5 it is seen that for the 99 "station-years" of New Jersey CO data (1968-73) the relationship between the standard deviation and annual average has a slope of 0.56 (i.e., coefficient of variation is 0.56) which is a little larger than the 0.49 observed in the CAMP data. 2 The standard deviation-annual average relationship for the 1972 U.S. data (82 stations) had a slope of 0.53 which was not significantly different from 0.5. Figure 6 shows that for the New Jersey data the annual average is a good predictor of the percent of the time the CO standard is exceeded.…”
Section: Relationship Between Annual Average and Percent Of Time The mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Conclusions // the carboxyhemoglobin study published in the AMA Journal 5 was of a representative sample of the population in the cities studied, and if the CAMP data on which trend analysis was performed came from uniformly sited analyzers, 7 then the resulting correlation may be indeed highly significant: the required reductions in measured ambient CO levels may be directly related to the COHb concentration of the population. However, if this is not the case, the CO abatement strategies should be…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If only the five cities from which CAMP data were available are considered, however, the correlation is significant at the 90% confidence level with a correlation coefficient at 0.87. mean value of data from several cities using CAMP data. 7 This may indicate that a different technique should be considered as the basis for evaluating CO data. The data considered were taken only from CAMP stations for which several years data were available.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Ambient Air Co Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear rollback formula of Equation 1 has been widely used to estimate reductions required to meet ambient air quality standards for various pollutants (8)(9)(10). It has been most widely used for CO control.…”
Section: Air Quality Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure8. Fractional reduction in hydrocarbon emissions based on the federal ambient air quality standard of 0.24 ppmC, 3-hr average, as determined by linear rollback.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%