2019
DOI: 10.1364/boe.10.002367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Narrowband-autofluorescence imaging for bone analysis

Abstract: We present a new autofluorescence-imaging method for bone analysis. This method, based on the autofluorescence of bone, provides color images in microscopic scale. The color images are created from three monochrome images acquired with optimal excitation-and emission-wavelengths combinations. The choice of these combinations were determined from the study of two-dimensional distributions of bone-features-bispectral autofluorescence in the visible-and ultraviolet-spectral range. We demonstrate that main-bone fe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CD68 mRNA expression was strong in the bone marrow (Figure 5A,C) and in the interface between the periosteum and cortical bone (Figure 5B,D) with both in situ techniques. Autofluorescence of bone tissue was previously described [50][51][52]. To confirm that the detected fluorescence resulted from an in situ-HCR signal and did not derive from nonspecific binding of an Alexa Fluor 488 molecule or from autofluorescence, hybridization was evaluated by microspectrofluorimetry (Figure 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CD68 mRNA expression was strong in the bone marrow (Figure 5A,C) and in the interface between the periosteum and cortical bone (Figure 5B,D) with both in situ techniques. Autofluorescence of bone tissue was previously described [50][51][52]. To confirm that the detected fluorescence resulted from an in situ-HCR signal and did not derive from nonspecific binding of an Alexa Fluor 488 molecule or from autofluorescence, hybridization was evaluated by microspectrofluorimetry (Figure 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Autofluorescence of bone tissue was previously described [ 50 , 51 , 52 ]. To confirm that the detected fluorescence resulted from an in situ-HCR signal and did not derive from nonspecific binding of an Alexa Fluor 488 molecule or from autofluorescence, hybridization was evaluated by microspectrofluorimetry ( Figure 6 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that bone tissue has strong autofluorescence [ 62 , 63 ]. This makes it rather difficult to analyze the operated tissue with immunolabeling (using fluorophore-labeled antibody) because there was an abundant autofluorescence in the regenerating region ( Figure 6 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, however, the multiple fluorophores shared between the center and outer border are more difficult to reconcile, as the center is believed to be a mineralization hub only earlier in skeletal development (see above). In the case of the center region, perhaps the AF signal is related to tissue age and degree of mineralization, as in bone [56]. The tissue properties and components at the root of the AF differences among the center, peripheral and outer border regions require characterization; however, their autofluorescent characteristics and the accretionary growth of tesserae argue these differences are linked to the regions having specific developmental roles and/or representing important turning points in the mineralization of the skeleton.…”
Section: Tesseraementioning
confidence: 99%