2010
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2010.2056913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Narrow Linewidth DFB Lasers Emitting Near a Wavelength of 1064 nm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
28
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental RF spectra can be approximated as having a Voigt profile, which is a convolution of Lorentzian and Gaussian lineshapes. The Lorentzian contribution is due to spontaneous emission and describes the intrinsic linewidth of the laser itself [6]. The Gaussian part is due to technical noise and is attributed to mechanical vibrations, temperature fluctuations and injection current noise.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental RF spectra can be approximated as having a Voigt profile, which is a convolution of Lorentzian and Gaussian lineshapes. The Lorentzian contribution is due to spontaneous emission and describes the intrinsic linewidth of the laser itself [6]. The Gaussian part is due to technical noise and is attributed to mechanical vibrations, temperature fluctuations and injection current noise.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other parameters are as follows: C is the acceptor with concentration N a =210 18 cm -3 ; (L x :L y :L z )=(0.2m:20m:350m); T=293K; R 1 =1; ground for deriving (5) for different types of lasers it is possible to ascertain qualitative generality of the obtained simulation results of Fabry-Perot lasers for other types of lasers. It allows us to explain the behavior of all known experimental measurements of semiconductor laser natural linewidth which have a minimum [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] within the framework of our theoretical optical model with phenomenological parameters (n 1, n 2 ,β) for calculation of the natural linewidth. 2.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. We can explain the minimum of experimental function  =F(1/ P ) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8], basing on the formulas (5) -(7) derived. The influence of phase perturbations of spontaneous radiation on  decreases with the growth of power (see (6) for P A ).…”
Section: Interpretation Of Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations