Spanish-Language Narration and Literacy 2008
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511815669.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Narrative Stance in Venezuelan Children's Stories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Micro analysis: the unit of analysis was the clause, within which we identified stance-taking resources, understood as the linguistic markers speakers use to signal their roles. Thus, we coded for evaluative language (Shiro, 2003(Shiro, , 2007(Shiro, , 2008, the main linguistic resource for expressing subjectivity and therefore, for signaling stance. For each clause, we determined if it contained three types of evaluation (see Table 1, 2 and 3 for a brief definition and examples):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Micro analysis: the unit of analysis was the clause, within which we identified stance-taking resources, understood as the linguistic markers speakers use to signal their roles. Thus, we coded for evaluative language (Shiro, 2003(Shiro, , 2007(Shiro, , 2008, the main linguistic resource for expressing subjectivity and therefore, for signaling stance. For each clause, we determined if it contained three types of evaluation (see Table 1, 2 and 3 for a brief definition and examples):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Du Bois defines positioning as "the act of situating a social actor with respect to responsibility for stance and for invoking sociocultural values" (p. 143). Stance-taking then relies on the use of evaluative language, understood as the markers of speaker's attitude (reference to internal states such as emotion, cognition and volition, [Shiro, 2003[Shiro, , 2008); and the use of evidential markers, understood as speaker's reference to the status of the information in the utterance (source of information, modes of knowing, degree of certainty, [Chafe, 1986]; [Shiro, 2004[Shiro, , 2007).…”
Section: Participants' Role and Positioning In Argumentative Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, low-income indigenous or Afro-Caribbean Costa Rican six-to-nineyear-olds did not display such similar structure in personal narration. Shiro (2008) found that six to 11year-old Venezuelan children's socioeconomic status had a considerable impact on the form of evaluation used in fictional, but not personal narratives, making personal narratives the more apt form of narration to be examined in low-income populations.…”
Section: The Importance Of Personal Narrative Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De acuerdo con Shiro (2008), el tipo de narración, personal o de fi cción, infl uye en las evaluaciones que se expresan; las interpretaciones sobre emociones, que se expresan en tercera persona, son más frecuentes en las narraciones de fi cción; mientras que la postura del narrador, que se expresa en primera persona, es más frecuente en las narraciones personales.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…De acuerdo con Shiro (1998), la tendencia evolutiva es primero expresar un reporte directo de las emociones (tercera persona: "está enojada") y posteriormente realizarlo de manera personal (primera persona: "creo que está enojada"). En el análisis por tipo de narración (personal o de fi cción) encontró que las evaluaciones desde la perspectiva del personaje (expresadas en 3ª persona) son más frecuentes en las narraciones de fi cción y las evaluaciones desde la perspectiva del narrador (expresadas en 1ª persona) son más frecuentes en las narraciones personales, como lo había anticipado (Shiro, 2008). No obstante, un análisis realizado por Shiro (2003Shiro ( , 2008 contrastando las narraciones por nivel socioeconómico, mostró que solo los niños de nivel alto (escuela privada) muestran diferencias signifi cativas relacionadas con el grado escolar (1º vs. 4º grado) en la calidad de su lenguaje evaluativo.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified