2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00303.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Narrative and learning with Web 2.0 technologies: towards a research agenda

Abstract: This paper investigates the impact of Web. 2.0 technologies on the ways learning can be conceived of as a narrative process within contemporary contexts, using blogs as an illustrative example. It is premised on the concept of narrative as a way in which individuals represent and organize experience in order to learn from it and make it shareable with others within social contexts. The first part of the paper offers a theoretical analysis of the role of narrative in the social construction of knowledge by the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These skills in turn produce a better understanding of course material (Chong, 2010). Indeed, Pachler and Daly (2009) conceive of this type of learning as a narrative process in which students organise experience in order to learn from it. Similarly, Nevid (2011) argued that current students, whom he refers to as millennials, are superficial processors of information.…”
Section: Web 20 Technology: Blogsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These skills in turn produce a better understanding of course material (Chong, 2010). Indeed, Pachler and Daly (2009) conceive of this type of learning as a narrative process in which students organise experience in order to learn from it. Similarly, Nevid (2011) argued that current students, whom he refers to as millennials, are superficial processors of information.…”
Section: Web 20 Technology: Blogsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast we want to explore new learning designs and practices that were previously impossible without the integration of new technologies (Pachler, 2007;Rushby, 2012;Traxler, 2010Traxler, , 2016. This involves interrogating educational problems and designing authentic situated learning environments that are student negotiated and student-determined -that is moving from teacher-directed pedagogies to student-determined learning or heutagogy (Blaschke, 2012;Hase & Kenyon, 2007;Narayan & Herrington, 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Word, category and conceptual frequency analyses are some of its primary areas of focus. At the most basic level, the main purpose of this method is to locate the nature of the relative patterns within and between sets of data (Heckman & Annabi, 2005;Huffaker & Calvert, 2005;Lowe, 2003;Pachler & Daly, 2009;Petrina, 1998). For its part conversational analysis studies conversation and deals with such aspects as talk, conversation structure, adjacency pairs, preference, repairs, floor, turn-taking, and participants (Levinson, 1983;Norrick, 1991;Sacks, 1994).…”
Section: Data Analysis Model and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%