2022
DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s362720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanostructured Titanium Implant Surface Facilitating Osseointegration from Protein Adsorption to Osteogenesis: The Example of TiO2 NTAs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
(179 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, surface energy and hydrophilicity of the NT samples increased after the anodic oxidation process, which plays a critical role in protein adsorption . It is known that changes in surface hydrophobicity and energy can alter the adsorption of proteins and their conformation, which in turn dictate stem cell adhesion and differentiation . For instance, anodized titanium surfaces were shown to be more hydrophilic compared to their NA counterparts, which induced higher fibronectin adsorption and thus allowed higher stem cell adhesion and osteogenic differentiation. , …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, surface energy and hydrophilicity of the NT samples increased after the anodic oxidation process, which plays a critical role in protein adsorption . It is known that changes in surface hydrophobicity and energy can alter the adsorption of proteins and their conformation, which in turn dictate stem cell adhesion and differentiation . For instance, anodized titanium surfaces were shown to be more hydrophilic compared to their NA counterparts, which induced higher fibronectin adsorption and thus allowed higher stem cell adhesion and osteogenic differentiation. , …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[40] Additionally, the clustered TiO 2 nanotube surface modified by plateletderived growth factor (PDGF)-BB boosted the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs and bone regeneration in vivo. [41] Interestingly, besides osteogenic differentiation, arrays of TiO 2 nanotubes with a diameter of 30 nm showed the potential for vascularization by increasing the activity of endothelial cells, [42] and the ≈85 nm spaced Ti nanorod array switched macrophage (M𝜑) from M1 to M2 phenotype. [43] Notably, nanoporous Ti surface with about 30 nm diameter alleviated the inhibition of osteoclasts on osteogenesis by changing the secretion of cytokines and accelerated bone regeneration by macrophage cytokine profiles, which indicated that the morphology of Ti surface was critical for modulating monocyte/M𝜑 lineage commitment, thereby providing guidance for promoting osseointegration by coupling the osteogenesis and osteoclastogenesis (Figure 1c).…”
Section: Ti-based Nanostructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differentiation of macrophages in vivo is the result of changes in the microenvironment, 45 which is highly related to the surface properties of biomaterials. In this study, we demonstrated that Tanfloc could inhibit the preinflammatory differentiation induced by LPS, a classic inflammation factor produced by bacteria that widely existed in sites with peri-implantitis.…”
Section: Cell Proliferation Testmentioning
confidence: 99%