2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.08.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoscale pore structure characterization of the Bakken shale in the USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
142
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
142
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Concurrently, the pore-size distribution of a sister core, cut from the same whole core as Sample B (Akbarabadi & Piri, 2014;Akbarabadi et al, 2017), showed most of the pores to be smaller than 400 nm. This pore-size distribution is in agreement with others reported in the literature for same reservoir Liu et al, 2017;Saidian & Prasad, 2015;Zhang et al, 2013). By comparing Figure 11 with the pore-size distribution of Sample B, it is apparent that the precipitated salt crystals could easily occlude the pore space and significantly reduce the permeability of the rock.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Concurrently, the pore-size distribution of a sister core, cut from the same whole core as Sample B (Akbarabadi & Piri, 2014;Akbarabadi et al, 2017), showed most of the pores to be smaller than 400 nm. This pore-size distribution is in agreement with others reported in the literature for same reservoir Liu et al, 2017;Saidian & Prasad, 2015;Zhang et al, 2013). By comparing Figure 11 with the pore-size distribution of Sample B, it is apparent that the precipitated salt crystals could easily occlude the pore space and significantly reduce the permeability of the rock.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…2,32 Different sized pores within the Chang 6 reservoir samples that have different permeabilities account for different proportions of the total pore throats, and the contribution to permeability is different (Figure 7). 2,32 Different sized pores within the Chang 6 reservoir samples that have different permeabilities account for different proportions of the total pore throats, and the contribution to permeability is different (Figure 7).…”
Section: Influence On Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pore throats can be divided into nano pores (less than 0.1 μm), sub-micro pores (0.1-1 μm), and micro pores (larger than 1 μm) based on their sizes and according to the classification of pore throats in petroleum geology. 2,32 Different sized pores within the Chang 6 reservoir samples that have different permeabilities account for different proportions of the total pore throats, and the contribution to permeability is different (Figure 7). The proportion of nano pores to the total pore volume decreased with the increase of permeability, while the proportion of sub-micro pores linearly increased; when core permeability was low (less than 1 × 10 −3 μm 2 ), micro pores were almost nonexistent, and when permeability was over 1 × 10 −3 μm 2 , only a few micro pores were distributed within the sample (less than 5%).…”
Section: Influence On Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31][32][33] The adsorption and desorption curves of the sampled volcanic rocks in the target layer show obvious hysteresis loops, indicating the development of nanoscale pores in the volcanic tight reservoirs of the Haerjiawu Formation in the Santanghu Basin, with strong heterogeneity. The study of the adsorption-desorption curve enables the volcanic rocks in the target layer to be divided into two types: the adsorption and desorption curves of one set of samples are convex upward at low pressure (0 < P/P 0 < 0.05), signifying adsorption of liquid nitrogen on a monolayer of a rock sample surface, or microspore filling.…”
Section: Morphological Characteristics Of the Poresmentioning
confidence: 99%