2019
DOI: 10.1002/ese3.302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of micro‐pore structure in tight sandstone reservoir on the seepage and water‐drive producing mechanism—a case study from Chang 6 reservoir in Huaqing area of Ordos basin

Abstract: To study the influence of pore structure on the seepage and water‐drive producing mechanisms, various methods were combined to describe the micro‐pore structure in the Chang 6 tight sandstone reservoir in the Huaqing area, Ordos Basin, China. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) was combined with displacement experiments to determine the distribution of oil and water in pores of different scales before and after water flooding. There are few micro pores in the reservoir. As permeability increases, the distribution… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The water storage capacity depends on the porosity of the coal specimens, while water adsorption is an external manifestation of the size and distribution of cracks in the coal, and micro‐pore structure also has a certain effect on seepage and water drive . An increase in the water adsorption of coal specimens indicates an increase and extension of cracks within the structure and an increase in fluid permeability in the coal .…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The water storage capacity depends on the porosity of the coal specimens, while water adsorption is an external manifestation of the size and distribution of cracks in the coal, and micro‐pore structure also has a certain effect on seepage and water drive . An increase in the water adsorption of coal specimens indicates an increase and extension of cracks within the structure and an increase in fluid permeability in the coal .…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesopores are between 2 and 50 nm, and micropores are smaller than 2 nm 12,13 . The micropores and mesopores volume in the tight reservoir rocks have an important influence on the reservoir storage performance, oil and gas distribution, and fluid flow characteristics 14,15 . There are several commonly used methods to determine the pore size distribution of reservoir rocks, such as high‐pressure mercury intrusion method (HPMI), constant‐speed mercury intrusion (CSMI) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and low‐temperature nitrogen gas adsorption (LTN 2 GA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pore sizes obtained by different methods are different. It is impossible to fully characterize the pore structure of tight reservoirs just by one single method 11‐19 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although NMR is a rapid and harmless method, the T 2 spectrum distribution curve requires to be translated into PSD. The minimum measurement aperture by NMR is determined by the echo distance and the relative coefficient of particle surface [22,23]. Methods for qualitatively describing the type, size and surface morphology of pores include SEM, micro-computed tomography (μ-CT) and other image analysis methods [24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%