2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.88.064425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoscale multifunctional sensor formed by a Ni nanotube and a scanning Nb nanoSQUID

Abstract: Nanoscale magnets might form the building blocks of next generation memories. To explore their functionality, magnetic sensing at the nanoscale is key. We present a multifunctional combination of a nanometer-sized superconducting quantum interference device (nanoSQUID) and a Ni nanotube attached to an ultrasoft cantilever as a magnetic tip. By scanning the Nb nanoSQUID with respect to the Ni tube, we map out and analyze their magnetic coupling, demonstrate the imaging of an Abrikosov vortex trapped in the SQUI… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding contradicts the assumption of Ref. [19]; we attribute this discrepancy to the fact that while cantilever magnetometry measures the entire volume magnetization, the nanoSQUID is most sensitive to the magnetization at the bottom end of the nanotube, as shown in calculations of the coupling factor ¼ È= (flux È coupled to nanoSQUID by a pointlike particle with magnetic moment ) [20]. Still, we find a one-to-one correspondence between switching fields H sw;e detected by either the nanoSQUID or cantilever magnetometry.…”
Section: Prl 111 067202 (2013) P H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T Econtrasting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding contradicts the assumption of Ref. [19]; we attribute this discrepancy to the fact that while cantilever magnetometry measures the entire volume magnetization, the nanoSQUID is most sensitive to the magnetization at the bottom end of the nanotube, as shown in calculations of the coupling factor ¼ È= (flux È coupled to nanoSQUID by a pointlike particle with magnetic moment ) [20]. Still, we find a one-to-one correspondence between switching fields H sw;e detected by either the nanoSQUID or cantilever magnetometry.…”
Section: Prl 111 067202 (2013) P H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T Econtrasting
confidence: 61%
“…Using a scanning nanoSQUID and a cantilever-based torque magnetometer ( Fig. 1) [20], we investigate a Ni nanotube producing ÈðHÞ with a nearly square hysteresis, similar to the Ni nanowire of Ref. [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their large saturation magnetization favors fast spin dynamics 25 and provides one with large stray fields from nanoscopic tips, respectively, helping to improve magnetic microscopy. 26 Magnetic nanotubes were fabricated from either Ni or CoFeB by depositing the ferromagnetic shells around bottom-up grown GaAs nanowires. 27,28 The nanowires, which were grown using Ga droplets as catalysts, had lengths between about 10 and 20 μm.…”
Section: -3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exploiting the duality of our hybrid magnetometer, we measure both the stray magnetic flux generated by the NT with the nanoSQUID and the integrated magnetization by DCM. For the nanoSQUID measurements, the NT-tipped cantilever is positioned for optimal coupling at height z = 1.1 μm above the nanoSQUID's top electrode [9,19]. Despite this proximity of the nanoSQUID to the NT, the magnetic fields produced by the bias and modulation currents running through the nanoSQUID and its superconducting leads are much less than 1 mT at the position of the NT tip and do not significantly influence its magnetization state.…”
Section: Training Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%