2006
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.200500415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoscale Effects on the Ionic Conductivity of Highly Doped Bulk Nanometric Cerium Oxide

Abstract: Nanometric ceria powders doped with 30 mol % samaria are consolidated by a high‐pressure spark plasma sintering (HP‐SPS) method to form > 99 % dense samples with a crystallite size as small as 16.5 nm. A conductivity dependence on grain size was noted: when the grain size was less than 20 nm, only one semicircle in the AC impedance spectra was observed and was attributed to bulk conductivity. In contrast to previous observations on pure ceria, the disappearance of the grain‐boundary blocking effect is not asso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
60
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2 The ability to prepare dense materials and maintain the nanostructure has provided the opportunity to determine heretofore unrecognized nanoscale effects in materials. 3,4 Of the more than 1000 papers on sintering by PECS published in the last decade, few have attempted to provide fundamental understanding of the process 5 and thus the reasons for its superiority over conventional means remain largely not well understood. A common explanation provided in many publications is the role of plasma, proposed to exist between powder particles during sintering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The ability to prepare dense materials and maintain the nanostructure has provided the opportunity to determine heretofore unrecognized nanoscale effects in materials. 3,4 Of the more than 1000 papers on sintering by PECS published in the last decade, few have attempted to provide fundamental understanding of the process 5 and thus the reasons for its superiority over conventional means remain largely not well understood. A common explanation provided in many publications is the role of plasma, proposed to exist between powder particles during sintering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in contrast to spark plasma or hot isostatic pressure sintering, conventional sintering does not reduce the material and hence does not require an additional anneal in oxygen or air prior to electrical characterization. 18 For the measurement of electrical transport properties, metallic electrodes were applied to the opposing sides of the compact disk samples. For the 73 nm and 61 nm grain-sized samples sintered at 1000 and 950…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In several examples, the ionic conductivity increases for nanostructured materials such as CaF2-BaF2 fluoride ion conductors [14], CeO2 oxide ion conducting nanoceramics [15,16], and nanocrystalline LiNbO3 and LiTaO3 lithium ion conductors [17,18]. However, this is not straightforward since the ionic conductivity was found to decrease in other materials when the grain size is reduced [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grain growth of the nanopowder is due to the conventional sintering which includes heating at high temperatures for long durations. Therefore, other innovative sintering techniques such as spark plasma sintering (SPS) could overcome these drawbacks and yield nanoceramic materials [15,16,[20][21][22][23]. SPS experiments, which are performed at a lower temperature and for short time duration (within few minutes) compared to conventional sintering, can successfully minimize grain coarsening during the sintering process that leads to successful fabrication of dense nanomaterials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%