Nanoparticle Number Concentration in the Air in Relation to the Time of the Year and Time of the Day

Abstract

The paper analyzes suspended particles number concentrations of 61 size fractions (184 nm to 17,165 nm) in the air at a traffic location. The average course of the individual fractions was analyzed at various intervals – daily, weekly, monthly and annually, in the period between 2017 and 2019. The data was then used to calculate the arithmetic mean for all the fractions (MS Excel, R) and then using a proprietary web application, heatmaps were constructed. The obtained results showed significant differences in both the annual and daily variation of number concentrations between the individual fractions differing in particle size. In the case of the annual variation, one can see a greater variability of smaller particles, which is most likely due to the source of the actual suspended particles. Meteorological and dispersion conditions are found as important factors for suspended particle concentrations. These can lead to significant differences from year to year. However, a comparison between 2018 and 2019 showed that even though the average absolute number concentrations can differ between years, the actual relative number concentrations, i.e., the ratios between the individual fractions remain very similar. In conclusion it can be said that the difference between the number concentration variation of the size fractions depends on both the actual pollution sources (especially in the long-term, i.e., the annual variation) and the actual size of the particles, which plays a role especially in the short-term (daily, weekly variation).

Particulate Air Pollution and Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review

“…10 , 12–14 The classification of PM is based on its aerodynamic diameter but not its composition, wherein the particles with diameter <10 μm are grouped as PM 10 , <2.5 μm as PM 2.5 and <1 μm as PM 1 . 10 Ultrafine particles with aerodynamic diameter <0.2 μm 15–17 or ≤0.1 μm 18 , 19 are also being investigated but not as common as other PM species, probably due to the limitation in detection technology. These PMs are produced mainly from human activities, such as vehicle emission, coal or biomass combustion and high-temperature industrial works (manufacturing, mining, and agricultural activities).…”

Erythrocyte Vulnerability to Airborne Nanopollutants

“…Erythrocyte osmotic fragility test: For typical hemolysis assessments, a single concentration is tested [ 30 ]. However, exposure to airborne nanopollutants in everyday life can vary depending on factors such as proximity to the source, type of weather, and chronicity of the exposure among others [ 5 , 16 , 41 , 42 ]. Therefore, we conducted all tests, and analyses at both 0 and 24 h, using the following concentrations: 0.005 mg/mL, 0.01 mg/mL, 0.05 mg/mL, and 0.1 mg/mL.…”

Ambient Air Quality in the Czech Republic

“…Based on analysis of 14 elements and 12 water-soluble ions, the principal aerosol emission sources were identified. Brzezina et al [13] studied nanoparticle number concentrations of 61 size fractions (ranging between ca. 200 nm and 15 µm in aerodynamic diameter) in the air at a traffic site in Ústí nad Labem to compare the behaviour of various size fractions within a day, a week, and a year.…”