2013
DOI: 10.1002/ange.201210365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanomechanics of Cation–π Interactions in Aqueous Solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
82
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
9
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rmfp-1 has an exactly equal amount of cationic and phenolic groups (20 mol%) without any negatively charged residue, which reflects the intrinsic nature of the mussel adhesive. MADQUAT was chosen as the counterpart for the cation-rich polyelectrolyte for complex coacervation as the trimethylammonium group is expected to establish stronger cation-π interactions than the lysine of Rmfp-1 (27). Buffer pH was fixed at ∼3.0 (0.1 M sodium acetate, pK a = 4.8), at which the carboxyl terminus of Rmfp-1 is neutral (it is noted that the mussel adhesive secretes to a marine environment at pH below 3.0) (28).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Rmfp-1 has an exactly equal amount of cationic and phenolic groups (20 mol%) without any negatively charged residue, which reflects the intrinsic nature of the mussel adhesive. MADQUAT was chosen as the counterpart for the cation-rich polyelectrolyte for complex coacervation as the trimethylammonium group is expected to establish stronger cation-π interactions than the lysine of Rmfp-1 (27). Buffer pH was fixed at ∼3.0 (0.1 M sodium acetate, pK a = 4.8), at which the carboxyl terminus of Rmfp-1 is neutral (it is noted that the mussel adhesive secretes to a marine environment at pH below 3.0) (28).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5A shows the force-distance profile of a MADQUAT-coated mica surface interacting with an Rmfp-1-coated mica surface in 100 mM sodium acetate solution (pH ∼3.0). It is noted that the force curves during moving in and moving out of the two surfaces do not overlap, which was mainly due to the interaction differences between the interacting surfaces during approaching and separation (or so-called adhesion hysteresis as generally observed for adhesive systems) (20,27,39). The approaching force curve shows repulsion, which was mainly due to electrical double-layer repulsion between positively charged surfaces and steric interactions of the opposing polymer chains extended to aqueous solution, in competition with attractive interactions such as van der Waals and cation-π interactions.…”
Section: Physical Properties Of the Like-charged Coacervate Phase Meamentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4B): (1) bidentate intercatechol H-bonding is robust in aqueous solution (Ahn et al, 2014); (2) cation-π interactions between Lys and Dopa, Phe, Tyr or Trp, which are surprisingly cohesive in the Mfps (Lu et al, 2013a); (3) Ca 2+ salt bridges between paired pSer residues (i.e. electrostatic interactions), which were first noted in P. californica cement but are reckoned to be more widespread (Zhao et al, 2005;Ashton et al, 2011); and (4) hydrophobic interactions .…”
Section: A B Cohesive Interactions During Deposition (Low Ph)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the H-bonds between Dopa residues are surprisingly robust and can, in the absence of oxidation, maintain noncovalent cohesion across a range of pH (Ahn et al, 2014). With >15 mol% lysine and Dopa in many Mfps, cation-π interactions are well-supported as participants in Mfp-Mfp cohesion (Lu et al, 2013a), but these are unlikely to change significantly between pH 2 and pH 8. As in adhesion, electrostatic interactions are weak at pH 2-3, but their strength probably increases as the increase to pH 8 ionizes more acidic groups without substantially reducing the charged amines ( pK a 10.4).…”
Section: Plaque Cohesion In Seawatermentioning
confidence: 99%