2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(99)00085-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoleakage patterns of four dentin bonding systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
84
0
14

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
84
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Moreover, a lack of the resin infiltration has been found at the fractured surface after bond testing. [22][23][24][25][26][27] Water penetration to the adhesive interfaces via a bond defect (i.e., nanoleakage or the demineralized dentin zone) might induce bond deterioration due to the hydrolysis of the collagen fibrils or resin materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Moreover, a lack of the resin infiltration has been found at the fractured surface after bond testing. [22][23][24][25][26][27] Water penetration to the adhesive interfaces via a bond defect (i.e., nanoleakage or the demineralized dentin zone) might induce bond deterioration due to the hydrolysis of the collagen fibrils or resin materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon is thought to occur due to insufficient infiltration of resin monomer into demineralized dentin or extraction of incomplete polymerized monomers in the submicron interfacial spaces. Recently, it has been indicated that nanoleakage not only happens in the hybrid layer, but also in hydrophilic adhesive resin layer 15,16) . Nanoleakage permits water penetration which may accelerate plasticization of the resin and hydrolysis of exposed collagen within the hybrid layer, resulting in degradation of the adhesive interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most in vitro tests, there are variations in the period of storage, which can be 24 hours, a week, two weeks, 3, 6 or 12 months [18,11,19]. The storage time in the present study was 24 hours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The scientific literature contains studies reporting a reduction in infiltration based on the use of adhesive systems [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] over a short-term assessment period. Thus, shortterm results are material-dependent, given that long-term assessments have shown that the adhesive is not the dominant factor in terms of reducing infiltration around amalgam restorations [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%