2020
DOI: 10.1002/aoc.5999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanocomposite‐based inorganic‐organocatalyst Cu(II) complex and SiO2‐ and Fe3O4 nanoparticles as low‐cost and efficient catalysts for aniline and 2‐aminopyridine oxidation

Abstract: Bis‐imino Cu(II) complex (CuLAn2), in which the imine ligand (HLAn) acts as a bidentate chelating ligand, was synthesized. The catalytic potential of the inorganic‐organocatalyst was studied homogeneously and heterogeneously in the oxidation of aniline and 2‐aminopyridine by H2O2 or tBuOOH. Two heterogeneous inorganic‐organocatalysts, CuLAn2@Fe3O4 and CuLAn2@SiO2@Fe3O4, were synthesized by the successful immobilization of CuLAn2 on the Fe3O4 surface and the composited Fe3O4 with SiO2, respectively. The heterog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(103 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings support our results that ZnO–TiO 2 nanoparticles do not enhance the catalytic efficacy of the MoO 2 L 2 catalyst, likely due to their lower redox reactivity. Therefore, we are motivated further to explore immobilization of our MoO 2 L 2 catalyst on various other nanoparticles, e.g., Fe 3 O 4 , Fe 3 O 4 –TiO 2 , or Fe 3 O 4 –SiO 2 , as developed previously by our working group for Cu–Schiff base complexes Table S3. ,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These findings support our results that ZnO–TiO 2 nanoparticles do not enhance the catalytic efficacy of the MoO 2 L 2 catalyst, likely due to their lower redox reactivity. Therefore, we are motivated further to explore immobilization of our MoO 2 L 2 catalyst on various other nanoparticles, e.g., Fe 3 O 4 , Fe 3 O 4 –TiO 2 , or Fe 3 O 4 –SiO 2 , as developed previously by our working group for Cu–Schiff base complexes Table S3. ,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the visible area, a broad band was observed at 434 nm, which is due to the ligand charge transfer, i.e., L-ct, for HL interpreting the electron charging through the whole ligand molecule. 38 In a similar manner, the diluted solution of MoO 2 L 2 represented an observed band at 440 nm referring to the charge transfer from the coordinated ligand to cis-MoO 2 2+ ion, i.e., L-mct (Figure S6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Directly, in methanol, 4-hydroxybenzadlehyde was condensed with 2-aminophenol to give HL, as reported for various similar derivatives. 46 HL was coordinated with the Cu 2+ ion in a water-ethanol mixture in 2:1 equivalent amounts, respectively, to form CuL 2 , in which HL behaved as a monobasic bidentate pincer chelating ligand, as shown in Scheme 1. HL and CuL 2 gave respectable yields of 94% and 75% with 0.18 and 0.12 g, respectively.…”
Section: Formation and Characterization Of Hl And Culmentioning
confidence: 99%