Biosensors for Medical Applications 2012
DOI: 10.1533/9780857097187.1.65
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nano-sized biosensors for medical applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 183 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evenly covering the fabric with SWCNT is important because SWCNT plays a role in creating electronic properties for the non-conductive fabric, thanks to its nano-sized electrical interface with a diameter of only a few nanometers. 28
Figure 7.(a) The morphology of the pristine PET/SP sample, (b), (c) The morphology of the SWCNT-coated PET/SP sample.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evenly covering the fabric with SWCNT is important because SWCNT plays a role in creating electronic properties for the non-conductive fabric, thanks to its nano-sized electrical interface with a diameter of only a few nanometers. 28
Figure 7.(a) The morphology of the pristine PET/SP sample, (b), (c) The morphology of the SWCNT-coated PET/SP sample.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evenly covering the fabric with SWCNT is important because SWCNT plays a role in creating electronic properties for the non-conductive fabric, thanks to its nano-sized electrical interface with a diameter of only a few nanometers. 28 Simultaneously, the authors examined the correlation between the coating times, which is the time that the fabric was soaked in SWCNT, and the resistance of the coated samples. Specifically, two PET/SP samples with the same dimension of 10mm width by 100mm length were dipped in the SWCNT liquid for less than 5 min (denoted as sample 1) and 15 min (denoted as sample 2).…”
Section: Morphology Of the Textile Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biosensor performance is primarily based on the specific binding affinity of the analyte, how dense their coating is on transducer surface and orientation of bioreceptor after immobilization, in terms of ensuring the integrity of the binding and retaining their biological activity, to allow considerable electronic interaction between the biomolecule/analyte and transducer [21]. The overall efficiency of the transducer and bioreceptor is critically related to the detection outcome with respect to response time, signal-tonoise ratio, sensitivity and selectivity of a system [22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. The AD biomarkers using the biosensors are detected (i) using electrochemical techniques such as square wave voltammetry (SWV), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), cyclic voltammetry (CV) and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV); (ii) using optical techniques such as surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and laser surface plasmon resonance (LSPR); and (iii) using microscopic techniques like scanning electron microscopy (SEM); (iv) colorimetric and fluorometric technique [29].…”
Section: Nanomaterials In Biosensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the wide range of analytical tools, electrochemical sensors have shown significant advantages over other techniques (i.e., HPLC, spectrophotometry, colorimetry and chemiluminescence) due to their ability to provide cheap, fast, easy-to-use and in-line measurements [11]. An effective approach to improving the sensitivity and electrooxidation kinetics of electrochemical sensors is to employ nanostructured catalysts [12,13]. Furthermore, multiple studies have now shown a clear size-dependence of the catalytic activity that may briefly be ascribed to surface-enhancement and quantum effects [14,15], with detectable amounts ranging from 1-2 nM [16,17] up to 3 µM [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32Å in the 𝐵𝑖 𝑂 cluster and Bi(1)-Bi(8) = 3.3Å in the 𝐵𝑖 𝑂 𝑁𝑂 cluster; 𝑏 is the distance C(12)-C(15) = 2.79Å in the 𝐵𝑖 𝑂 cluster and C(27)-C(28) = 2.79Å in the 𝐵𝑖 𝑂 𝑁𝑂 cluster; R is the mean distance between Bi(30)-C(12) and Bi(27)-C(15) in the 𝐵𝑖 𝑂 cluster, and it is equal to 3.62Å; in 𝐵𝑖 𝑂 𝑁𝑂 , R is the mean…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%