2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nano/micro-scale numerical simulation and microscopic analysis on metal/oxide interfaces: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 177 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the stability of various interfaces with different orientations and atomic arrangements, the work of separation , of the interface was calculated by W = ( E Ni + E NiO – E NiO/Ni )/ A . In this formula, E Ni and E NiO are the total energies of the Ni substrate and NiO film, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To evaluate the stability of various interfaces with different orientations and atomic arrangements, the work of separation , of the interface was calculated by W = ( E Ni + E NiO – E NiO/Ni )/ A . In this formula, E Ni and E NiO are the total energies of the Ni substrate and NiO film, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, these models are very limited in representing the Ni/NiO interface. For example, in addition to the lattice mismatch, the crystallographic orientation and the atomic arrangement are also key factors needed to be considered when constructing an interface …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the catastrophe point, the interface cohesive relationship enters the softening stage, and the corresponding boundary displacement δ̅ ′ is (8) With a slight increase in δ̅ , the interface loses its bearing capacity and a fracture zone appears. The bulk materials are unloaded as this damage increases, accompanied by rapid release of elastic energy and interface spring-back (Figure 1a) (9) Evidently, in the limit of dδ̅ → 0, the spring-back length Δδ int after interface catastrophic failure reduces to (10) After the interface spring-back, the interface breaks suddenly and the interface traction decreases from t int ′ to t int ″ . Since the total energy of the interface system decreases with the decrease of interface traction (eq 5), the reduction of t int during interfacial fracture is accompanied by the release of system energy.…”
Section: Spring-backmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Layered metal–ceramic composites, which integrate the advantages of metal (e.g., ductility, electrical conductivity) and ceramics (e.g., high strength, chemical resistance), are key to many technological applications such as electronic devices, thermal barrier coatings (TBC), and semiconductors. , The metal/ceramic interface is a crucial component of layered metal–ceramic composites, and the adhesion of this interface plays a pivotal role in dominating the mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties of the composites . Because of differences in the lattice structure and properties (e.g., Young’s modulus, coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE)) between metals and ceramics, defects such as misfit dislocations appear at the interface, weakening the interface bonding and decreasing the effective interface area .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%