2007
DOI: 10.1080/10635150701656352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Naming Species in Phylogenetic Nomenclature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eomellivora is a giant and hypercarnivorous mustelid genus recorded from the Miocene of Eurasia (Wolsan and Semenov, 1996; and North America (Baskin 1988). Wolsan and Semenov (1996) distinguished a single species of Eomellivora (the nominotypical one) with two distinct (Vallesian and Turolian) chronosubspecies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eomellivora is a giant and hypercarnivorous mustelid genus recorded from the Miocene of Eurasia (Wolsan and Semenov, 1996; and North America (Baskin 1988). Wolsan and Semenov (1996) distinguished a single species of Eomellivora (the nominotypical one) with two distinct (Vallesian and Turolian) chronosubspecies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article (Article 21) was prepared over the subsequent months and submitted to the CPN for discussion. In the course of the discussion, Mieczyslaw Wolsan, a member of the CPN, made an alternative proposal ("Method T" in Wolsan, 2007b). Wolsan's proposal differs from the one presented here in only one way: a species name adopted in the context of phylogenetic nomenclature would take the form of the oldest potentially valid (ICZN) or legitimate (ICBN, BC) species binomen (generally the original combination) and would be permanently fixed.…”
Section: An Alternative Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inferences of species phylogeny in relation to segregation of ancient polymorphisms. Lee, 2002;Spangler, 2003;Dayrat et al, 2004;Dayrat, 2005;Dayrat and Gosliner, 2005;Fisher, 2006;Wolsan, 2007aWolsan, , 2007b, and at the two meetings of the ISPN (Laurin and Cantino, 2004Cantino, , 2006; see the Preface to the PhyloCode for additional information). The article on species names (Article 21) that the CPN recently adopted was prepared by the four of us.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of initial proposals on how to treat species names in the light of phylogenetic taxonomy have been presented in the literature (de Schander and Thollesson 1995;Cantino 1998;Cantino et al 1999;Rouse 2000, 2003;Artois 2001;Hillis et al 2001;Dayrat et al 2004;Dayrat 2005;Wolsan 2007;). These approaches worry primarily about how to convert traditional binomials into rank-free names that could be used in phylogenetic nomenclature.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Systematics and Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of expedients to avoid name duplication were explored, using a combination of names followed by sequential numbers, registration numbers, etc. (see a full list of proposals in Cantino et al 1999;Artois 2001;Wolsan 2007).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Systematics and Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%