2008
DOI: 10.1080/10635150802172176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species Names in the PhyloCode: The Approach Adopted by the International Society for Phylogenetic Nomenclature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only species names are italicized herein. Pursuant to Article 21.2 of the PhyloCode, the first word of species names are considered prenomen, not genus names (see also Dryat et al 2008). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only species names are italicized herein. Pursuant to Article 21.2 of the PhyloCode, the first word of species names are considered prenomen, not genus names (see also Dryat et al 2008). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning species names, we used binominal names – meaning prenomen (usually the genus name in the rank‐based code) and species name – as suggested by Dayrat et al . (2004), and now recommended by the recently adopted Article 21.5 of the PhyloCode (Dayrat et al . 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we use the name in this recommended sense to reference only the most recent common ancestor of extant tinamous and all of its descendants. Species conventions follow Dayrat et al (2008).…”
Section: Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%